O tem sem pisal pred leti, ko je tedanji glavni ekonomist Svetovne banke in nobelovec Paul Romer razkril manipulacijo glede indeksa kvalitete poslovnega okolja (Doing business) za Čile. Tega naj bi ekonomisti na Svetovni banki manipulirali z metodološkimi spremembami, da je indeks izkazoval pozitivni premik v času desnčarskih vlad in negativnega v času levičarskih vlad. Romer je to javno povedal in se Čilu opravičil. To priznanje je moral preklcai in čez dva tedna odstopil.
No, kasneje so odkrili resne metodološke probleme tega indeksa in uvedli revizijo sprememb metodologiji. Zdaj so odkrili “napake” za vsaj štiri države in umaknili objavljen indeks za dve leti. Vendar so problem očitno še globlji in celoten indeks temelji na zelo dvomljivi metodologiji. Da o politično motiviranih spremembah ne govorimo. Spodaj je izsek iz dobrega komentarja Jayatija Ghosha v Project Syndicate.
The World Bank should no longer publish its Doing Business index, owing to its flawed design and vulnerability to manipulation. The Bank also owes the developing world an apology for all the harm this misleading and problematic tool has already caused.
The Bank has already been forced to suspend publication of the index, owing to “irregularities” in its data. The latest brouhaha concerns straightforward number fudging. Apparently, data from four countries – Azerbaijan, China, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates – were inappropriately altered, at least for 2017 and 2019 (thus affecting the 2018 and 2020 Doing Business reports). Other irregularities may have occurred, too. The Bank has begun a “systematic review” of the last five years of data, launched an independent audit of the process, and pledged to correct the most-affected countries’ data.


You must be logged in to post a comment.