Geran-4 – robustno rusko ohišje s poceni tujimi komponentami in inovatovnim vodenjem, ki odlično deluje

Ukraine recently took a relatively intact Russian latest-model “Geran-4” drone that had made an emergency landing and immediately disassembled it on the spot into pieces.

After the teardown, the parts laid out on the table revealed a truth that was both absurd and utterly real:

The entire jet-powered superweapon, touted as unbeatable against Ukraine’s air defenses, had only its outermost casing and final assembly screws made and tightened by the Russians themselves—nearly all the critical innards inside were imported from abroad.

Let’s start with the powerplant. 

The older Geran-2 models used piston propellers, buzzing like tractors in flight at under 200 km/h, easily intercepted by Ukraine’s mobile air defense teams in pickup trucks with mounted machine guns. 

But cracking open this Geran-4 revealed a micro turbojet engine stuffed into its belly. 

Flight altitude shot straight up from 4,000 meters to 8,000 meters—double the old model’s; 

cruising speed hit 450 to 500 km/h, and it could go even faster. 

This thing could take off from Crimea, barrel over 700 km in one go, and plunge straight into Lutsk in northwestern Ukraine. 

Who made it? 

A peek inside showed Chinese-made micro turbojets. Some were labeled “Russian assembly,” but the core components were all Chinese goods.

Next, the eyes. 

The nose housed an electro-optical turret, combining daylight, night vision, and infrared in one. 

Tenfold optical zoom, plus 32x digital zoom. 

From 8,000 meters up, ground vehicles’ outlines were crystal clear below. 

It didn’t even need frontline scouts risking their lives for guidance. An operator, sitting at a rear workstation hundreds of kilometers away in Bryansk, Oryol, or Crimea—as long as the link held—could remotely steer it toward targets in real time, like playing a simulator.

So how does that real-time signal get transmitted? 

Experts pried two ordinary GSM modules from the fuselage, loaded with civilian SIM cards. 

Even more bizarre: On-site technicians sifting through the wreckage found not just Russian and Belarusian SIMs, but also cards from Ukrainian domestic carriers and even EU countries. 

Once the drone crossed the border, it just piggybacked on Ukraine’s local civilian cell towers to beam its real-time position back home.

What if it flew into some signal-dead boonies? 

It had a backup. 

Disassemblers pulled out a Chinese-made self-organizing Mesh modem from inside, with a 300 km comms radius. 

A formation of Gerans in the air could auto-relay for each other—you pass to me, I pass to the rear—stringing together a centerless mobile local network right in the sky, keeping video feeds from hundreds of kilometers away unbroken.

Finally, they got to the priciest bit: the onboard computer flight control board. 

Scraping off the coating on the mainboard, the chip’s silkscreen markings were half worn away, but the remaining English letters were still sharp and clear: 

Texas Instruments—U.S.-based Texas Instruments.

The on-site experts delivered a brutally cold summary: 

“The only truly Russian-made parts on this aircraft are the composite body shell and the final assembly workshop.”

These components eventually ship to the Alabuga special economic zone in Tatarstan, where workers snap the shell together, twist in the screws, and voilà—it’s a precision strike weapon screaming over the front lines every night. 

And per Ukraine’s military intelligence assessment, factories like Alabuga can now churn out about 3,000 Geran-4s and Geran-5s per month.

Four-plus years of war, stacks upon stacks of sanctions signed—and yet the guts of the most cutting-edge lethal weapons still pulse with the blood of global supply chains: 

Power and comms from off-the-shelf mature civilian gear, core control chips smuggled in from America, even positioning relays hitching rides on the enemy’s own SIM cards via their base stations.

This is the thorniest reality of modern warfare: 

Authoritarian regimes don’t need to coddle a self-sufficient military-industrial empire from scratch in a greenhouse. 

As long as civilian consumer-grade industrial products are up for grabs worldwide, as long as money-laundering channels and transshipment trade keep springing leaks everywhere, 

they can stitch together the planet’s civilian tech into industrial-scale killing factories at rock-bottom cost.

If the outside world’s sanctions just patch away at military goods lists without stemming the flood of massive dual-use gray-market flows, 

These cheap, deadly turbojet swarms will keep rolling off assembly lines, damn near impossible to truly stop.

 

En odgovor

  1. “Lepota” Geranov ni v tehnološki perfekciji temveč v ideji. Kako to gre, si poglejte v mojem članku na tem blogu:

    Zgodba družine dronov GERAN ali kaj se lahko naučimo iz ruskega primera

    Rusi,Iranci, Houthiji pa še posebej, so mojstri v tem.

    Lep primer je tank T34 iz druge svetovne vojne. Tank je bil na začetku tehnično boljši od nemških tankov, ampak ko se je pojavil nemški Tiger je imel ta jasno prednost. Je bil zato boljši tank? Ne, kot najboljši tank 2.sv. slovi ravno T34. Zakaj? Ker je bil “good enough”, ker je bil 6-krat cenejši za proizvodnjo in se ga je zato dalo proizvajati v velikih količinah, ker se ga je dalo enostavno popravljati na fronti in je bila zato njegova razpoložljivost večja, ker je bilo usposabljanje posadk enostavnejše in hitrejše in…še bi lahko naštevali.

    Kolega je nekoč dejal:

    Rusi delajo orožje za obrambo domovine, Američani pa zato, da nekdo zasluži.

    Dražje ko je orožje, več se zasluži. Na Zahod-u je obramba business. Zato draga menda “super precizna ” orožja, ki stanejo milijone. Ruski, kitajski, iranski ekvivalenti so pa magnitudo(e) cenejši. Kvantiteta je nova kvaliteta. V vojni to velja od nekdaj.

    Pa ne da Rusi tega ne bi znali ali razviti ali doma proizvesti. Vsi kompleksnejši sistemi , npr v tem primeru strateške manevrirne rakete, so v celoti narejeni doma. Ali pa protiladijski raketni sistem Granit, ki je imel zgoraj omenjeno MESH komunikacijo že v 80-tih letih prejšnjega stoletja.

    Članek pa, čeprav je podton v tem, da naj bi kazal na rusko zaostalost, vseeno pokaže bistveno spremembo uporabe sodobne tehnologije. Ta je lahko v zelo veliki meri bazirana na “off the shelf” tehnologiji. Tehnologiji, ki se masovno proizvaja, je zato hitro dostopna in poceni. Ki sicer ne dosega specialnih vojaških specifikacij za komponente, temveč je za večino primerov uporabe “good enough”.

    Naj dam še en primer: Starlink . Space X mora zaradi opovedi satelitov zamenjati več sto njih na leto. Vendar je to vseeno cenejše (ob raketah za večkratno uporabo pa sploh), kot manufakturno izdelovati satelite enega po enega kot je bil slučaj do zdaj. Musk-ova genialnost ni toliko v tehnologiji, temveč v konceptu. Tudi pri izdelavi avtomobilov Tesla. Podobno kot pri iranskih Shahedih oz. ruskih Geranih.

    Je pa to za glave tradicionalnega vojno-industrijskega kompleksa problem. Marsikje na svetu. Rusi so morali zamenjati obrambnega ministra Šojgu-ja, da se je lahko zgodila radikalna sprememba.

    Liked by 4 people

Komentiraj