Bine Kordež

Pred časom smo lahko prebrali članek o usmeritvah SDH pri preobrazbi Šaleške doline na področju energetike. Na korporativni konferenci Slovenskega državnega holdinga so predstavili načrte, kako naj bi po zaprtju TEŠ-a energetska lokacija v Šoštanju postala sodobno energetsko vozlišče in v izvedbo tega projekta bo družba HSE vložila precejšnja finančna sredstva. Kot smo lahko prebrali, predstavlja preobrazba energetske lokacije TEŠ enega največjih razvojih projektov slovenskega energetskega sistema.

Po sprejetih načrtih je eden najbolj prepoznavnih projektov preobrazbe plavajoča sončna elektrarna (SE) na Družmirskem jezeru. To naj bi bila največja tovrstna elektrarna v Evropi. Elektrarna bo letno proizvedla 140 GWh električne energije, kar predstavlja energijo potrebno za oskrbo 35 tisoč gospodinjstev. Vzporedno naj bi postavili tudi največji baterijski hranilnik v Sloveniji. Preobrazba zajema tudi celovito prenovo  sistema daljinskega ogrevanja v Šaleški dolini, katerega danes zagotavlja TEŠ. V vse tri navedene naložbe naj bi po oceni skupaj investirali okoli 370 mio eur.

Vsekakor lahko pozitivno ocenimo odločitev, da bo država namesto opuščanja energetskega območja izvedla celovito revitalizacijo. Predstavljene informacije želijo posredovati pozitivno zgodbo glede bodočnosti Šaleške doline. Za lažje razumevanje teh načrtov ter razmer ob zaprtju TEŠ-a pa vseeno ni odveč navesti še kakšno dodatno informacijo ali podatek. Navedba, kako bodo z elektriko iz plavajoče SE lahko oskrbovali 35 tisoč gospodinjstev je ljudem še nekako blizu, mogoče tudi strošek gradnje te elektrarne v višini 110 mio eur, podatek o moči elektrarne v višini 130 MW ali 300 MW moči baterij pa običajnemu bralcu ne pove veliko. Zato poglejmo te načrte nekoliko podrobneje, vzporedno s pogledom na dosedanjo proizvodnjo elektrike in toplote na tej lokaciji.

Nadaljujte z branjem→

The orange shit-gibbon Donald Trump Attacked Rowan Atkinson — and Gets a Brutal “Lesson” He Won’t Forget

Donald Trump thought he could score some easy political points by labeling Rowan Atkinson an “offender of Jesus,” simply because Atkinson spoke openly about compassion, second chances, and the idea that God’s love doesn’t discriminate. But he picked the wrong target.

Known for his calm demeanor, intelligence, and thoughtful voice beyond comedy, Rowan Atkinson didn’t just clap back—he delivered a response grounded in awareness, conviction, and a deep understanding of real-world struggles.

“The President of the United States just said I offend Jesus,” Atkinson began, calm but firm. “You want to know what actually offends Jesus? Turning your back on the poor, the sick, and the forgotten while protecting the rich and powerful.”

And he didn’t stop there.

“You know what else offends Jesus?” he continued. “Separating families. Treating immigrants like criminals. Forgetting that most people are just trying to survive.”

Nadaljujte z branjem→

The most disturbing finding in Anthropic’s paper…

Anthropic just analyzed 1.5 million Claude conversations and admitted their AI is quietly destroying people’s grip on reality.

The paper is called “Who’s in Charge?” and the findings are worse than anything I’ve read this year.

They studied real conversations from a single week in December 2025. Real people. Real chats. No simulations.

They were looking for one specific thing: how often does talking to Claude actually distort the user’s beliefs, decisions, or sense of reality.

The numbers are devastating.

1 in 1,300 conversations led to severe reality distortion. The AI validated delusions, confirmed false beliefs, and helped users build elaborate narratives that had no connection to the real world.

1 in 6,000 conversations led to action distortion. The AI didn’t just agree with users. It pushed them into doing things they wouldn’t have done on their own. Sending messages. Cutting off people. Making decisions they’ll regret.

Nadaljujte z branjem→

What China just did with the blocking statutes against U.S. extraterritorial sanctions sets quite a major precedent, probably the financial equivalent of what happened with rare earths last year (in the sense that this is China taking a major step to push back against a U.S. hostile measure as opposed to taking it on the chin).

It’s a little complex but, to start with, what many people ignore (and will probably be surprised by) is that – by and large – Chinese companies and financial institutions have largely complied with extraterritorial U.S. sanctions.

Anecdotal story on this: I know for a fact, because I personally know the person, that a very famous guy (whose name I won’t reveal but that everyone of you would know) sanctioned by the U.S. was in China recently and tried to exchange money at the counter of a random Chinese bank. Just simply exchange dollars for a Chinese yuan, in mainland China. And he was refused, because he is sanctioned by the U.S. – despite the fact that China as a country has absolutely no problem with the person.

This goes to illustrate just how much goodwill China extended to the U.S. on this – a Chinese bank, in China, refusing to serve someone China has no problem with, just to comply with U.S. extraterritorial sanctions.

It also goes to illustrate why this blocking order marks such a sharp departure.

Nadaljujte z branjem→

Oil hitting a wartime record illustrates the Iran conflict’s continued ability to upend the world two months in.

But the geopolitical impact of the United Arab Emirates’ drive to carve out its own niche in the region may prove to be a more permanent shift.

The UAE leaving OPEC was perhaps less of a shock to the oil cartel itself. Some believe the emirates will have little choice but to continue working with it to keep global energy markets stable. Still, the UAE is likely to eventually raise production and US President Donald Trump said the move would help lower energy prices.

It’s very much in line with the UAE’s push to lead change in a post-oil era. The timing meant oil prices didn’t drop. OPEC is, after all, of little consequence while the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked.

More difficult to predict is how the regional power play will unfold.

Gulf heavyweight Saudi Arabia hasn’t seen eye to eye with its neighbor for years. The UAE is regarded by some as causing fragmentation in an already fragile region through forging an alliance with Israel and refusing to rein in global ambitions spanning Yemen, the Horn of Africa and Sudan.

Underscoring its unilateral approach, the UAE is reconsidering its membership of two regional bodies in which Saudi Arabia holds sway — the Arab League and Organization of Islamic Cooperation — while weighing its long-term involvement in the six-member Gulf Cooperation Council.

The moves could be read as an indictment of Saudi failures within the GCC and larger Arab world.

The divergent camps reflect how many now perceive the future of regional security.

An alliance led by Turkey and Saudi Arabia may emerge, and maybe down the line, one with a different Iran. Without the UAE, it may be easier for others to work together on what to do about Israel.

You can’t change geography.

But it’s hard to escape the sense that a new balance of power is arising.

Vir: Bloomberg

The relationship between the Emirates and the Saudis has been deteriorating for several years. Old grudges go back to the 1974 Jeddah Treaty, which was supposed to settle disputed borders.

The Emirates claim they were forced to hand over oil-rich territory (the Shaybah field) and a land corridor linking the country to Qatar in exchange for Saudi recognition of their independence.

In the early 2000s tensions flared again when Saudi Arabia blocked Emirati maritime infrastructure projects, claiming they crossed its territorial waters. There were even naval incidents involving coast guard vessels.

In Yemen the rift became glaringly obvious. In 2018-2019, UAE-backed forces clashed directly with troops of the internationally recognized government, which were supported by Saudi Arabia. Heavy fighting broke out in Aden, with dozens killed and wounded as separatists seized parts of the city.

A brief calm followed. Then, between December 2025 and January 2026, the STC, heavily backed by Abu Dhabi, advanced and seized the governorates of Hadramaut and Mahra, precisely the ones bordering Saudi Arabia.

Riyadh responded with airstrikes on ships and cargoes linked to the UAE, accused Abu Dhabi of threatening national security, and gave a 24-hour ultimatum for Emirati forces to leave Yemen.

After the withdrawal, the STC itself was weakened and partially dismantled.

Nadaljujte z branjem→

Terminska cena Brent nafte je 120 $/sodček, skoraj dvakrat višje kot pred tremi meseci. In znak, da nafte primanjkuje na svetovnem trgu, je to, da je cena ruske nafte Urals blizu ali celo nad ceno Brent nafte.

In dlje časa traja pomanjkanje nafte, bližji sta kotaciji Brent in severnoameriške WTI nafte. In tem višje so cene goriva v ZDA. Te pa povzročajo pravo politično bolečino Trumpovi administraciji in republikancem pred vmesnimi volitvami v drugi polovici leta.

O tem si še nisem povsem izoblikoval mnenja. Gre za predpostavko Trumpove racionalnosti:

(A) Če je Trump racionalen, ne bo tvegal popolne eskalacije in bo raje modeloval za konec vojne, kajti v nasprotnem primeru je njegove politične kariere in njegovega slovesa konec. In konec je ameriškega imperija, kot smo ga poznali.

(B) Toda če Trump ni povsem racionalen, lahko tvega eskalacijo, ker se ne more umakniti. Mora jo tvegati, ker verjame, da ne sme izgubiti. Pa čeprav ve, da bo izgubil in da bo s tem porazom konec ameriškega imperija.

I spoke with a macro hedge fund manager who manages billions in assets this week. He had reached out to talk about the war. One pushback he had has stayed with me.

He said he agreed that the US has been defeated; that the mature-strike regime necessarily meant that the world is multipolar; that Iran is a great power; and that the economic cost of trying to ‘finish the job’ was forbidding.

But all this did not necessarily mean that they will agree to a negotiated peace as my central scenario envisioned. The political culture in the imperial metropole, he suggested, may simply not permit even tacit acceptance of defeat required by a peace settlement.

Nadaljujte z branjem→

Evropski politiki delajo klasično napako, ki jih bo stala oblasti in kariere. Kdor interese volilcev potepta zaradi interesov tretje države, je politično mrtev.

Težko je, da ti ne bi bilo všeč, kako Iranci igrajo v tej vojni z Američani. Ne hecajo se. Trump moleduje za pogajanja. Pošilje svoja nepremičninarja kot pogajalca. Iranci povedo vnaprej, da ne pridejo. Enostransko podaljša premirje, ki ga Iranci nočejo.  Spet napove, da pošilja svoja nepremičninarja. Iranci spet povedo vnaprej, da ju pošiljajo zaman, ker njih ne bo. Trump mora odpovedati potovanje njegivih nepremičninarjev. 

V spodnjem zapisu je napaka: Napaka ameriške strani ni, da pošiljajo nepremičninarja in da bi Iranci raje podpredsednika Vancea.  Napaka ameriške strani je v tem, da Trump še ni pripravljen priznati poraza in pristati na iranske pogoje za trajni mir. Napaka ameriške strani je v tem, da Trump misli, da se lahko iz te vojne izvleče cel, Iran pa ne. Ali pa vsaj oba enako potolčena. Toda Iran je to vojno zmagal, ZDA pa izgubile. Dokler Trump tega ni pripravljen sprejeti, pogajanja za iransko stran niso smiselna.

From: Iran is begging for negotiations so I’m sending Jared and Witkoff to: We’re not sending anyone because we have all the cards. All within 24 hours.

Iran kept saying they won’t negotiate with Jared Kushner (who they correctly see as an agent of Israel) or with Witkoff (who they think is dumb). They want someone on Vance’s level.

And they kept saying they won’t negotiate under a US blockade. But a huge group of people believe anything Trump says, even if he says the exact opposite the day before or they after.

Hence: Iran is on its knees begging for a deal and will give us everything we want: as we’ve been hearing for two months now.