Meje rasti – Brez zasebne pobude in profitnega motiva zastane razvoj

Večina tistih, ki razmišlja o razvoju, o njem večinoma razmišlja statično. Izhaja iz sedanjega stanja odkritih (naravnih in človeških) virov ter iz sedanjega poznavanja možnosti in metod njihove uporabe. Nato pa na podlagi tega znanja sklepa v bodočnost. Paradoksalno, o prihodnosti razmišlja statično. To pa je garancija za napako.

Leta 1972 je bila pod okriljem Rimskega kluba objavljena odmevna knjiga Meje rasti (štirih avtorjev), ki je na podlagi ekonomskega modela World3, predpostavk o omejenih naravnih virih ter rasti industrializacije in števila prebivalcev napovedala gospodarski in socialni kolaps v 21. stoletju. Knjiga se je naslanjala tudi na Malthusove teze iz leta 1798. No, resnici na ljubo, trendi niso šli na roko avtorjem knjige. Napaka je bila v tem, ker so v modelu upoštevali, da število prebivalcev, kapital in onesnaževanje okolja naraščajo eksponencialno, medtem ko so za tehnologije za povečanje količine virov (boljše izkoriščanje) ter na nadzor nad onesnaževanjem uporabili predpostavke zelo nizke rasti ali sploh nobene.

Zaskrbljenost nad omejenostjo naravnih virov ter nad ravnanjem z njimi je seveda vedno upravičena. Toda hkrati nam prav te omejitve in naša odgovornost vedno znova odpirajo nova obzorja za razvoj in premikajo meje razvoja vedno višje.

Leta 1898 so v New Yorku gostili prvo mednarodno konferenco o načrtovanju mest. Glavna tema konference je bil konjski gnoj in smrad, ki sta pestila večino mest.

Seveda, viri so omejeni. Vedno so bili. Tako pred 10.000 leti kot pred 5000 leti, leta 1765, leta 1898 ali leta 2011. Tako kot so se pred 5000 leti bali, da so na robu možnosti preživetja, ker se jim je zdelo, da ni dovolj živali, ki bi ji lahko nalovili za preživetje družin ali plemen, tudi danes menimo, da smo prišli do skrajnih možnosti izrabe omejenih virov. Toda v takšnih okoliščinah se vedno najde rešitev, tehnološka inovacija, ki – ker omogoča z bolj učinkovito metodo bolje uporabiti omejene vire – meje razvoja premakne višje. Takrat so iznašli poljedelstvo in gojenje domačih živali namesto selitvenega načina življenja, ki je temeljilo zgolj na lovu in slučajno najdenih naravnih dobrinah.

Leta 1765 je James Watt izumil parni stroj, ki je naredil revolucijo v prometu in industriji in spet pomaknil meje rasti višje.

Leta 1898 so v New Yorku gostili prvo mednarodno konferenco o načrtovanju mest. Glavna tema konference je bil konjski gnoj in smrad, ki sta pestila večino mest, saj je promet temeljil na konjskih vpregah. Konferenco so končali kot brezplodno v treh namesto načrtovanih sedmih dnevih, ker niso našli rešitve. Zdelo se je, da je situacija breizhodna – brez konjskega prometa mesta niso mogla preživeti, z njegovim stranskim produktom pa tudi ne.

No, leta 1896 je Karl Benz sestavil prvi motor z notranjim izgorevanjem. Benzovo podjetje je leta 1899 kot največje avtomobilsko podjetje na svetu izdelalo 572 primerkov. Zatem je sledil plaz novih proizvajalcev. Še malo prej je Nikola Tesla izumil elektromagnetni motor z izmeničnm tokom (1887) in prenos izmeničnega toka na dolge razdalje (1888). Leta 1894 je bila na podlagi Teslovih izumov postavljena prva elektrarna z izmeničnim tokom (na Niagarskih slapovih), ki je lahko z elektriko oskrbovala nekaj mest. Oboje, avtomobili in električni tramvaji, so nekaj let kasneje v mestih odpravili zadrego s konjskimi vpregami in njihovimi stranskimi produkti ter pomaknili meje razvoja mest bistveno višje.

Danes, dobro stoletje kasneje, se soočamo z velikim onesnaženjem zaradi prevelike uporabe avtomobilov. Toda čez nekaj let bo prišlo do naslednje velike iznajdbe, ki bo – za nekaj časa – rešila to zadrego.

Podobno je z drugimi stvarmi. Svet je dinamičen, nove tehnološke iznajdbe in njihove vpeljave v prakso (za kar potrebujemo podjetnike) v duhu schumpeterijanske kreativne destrukcije pomikajo meje razvoja in rasti naprej. In to na boljše. Danes je mestni zrak, ki je odvisen od industrije, čistejši od tistega leta 1900 ali 1960. Zastarele industrije ni več, ekološki standardi pa so bistveno višji. Seveda, večina umazane industrije se je premaknila v manj razvite države, predvsem na Kitajsko. Toda tudi tam se ekološki standardi izboljšujejo in bodo kmalu sposobni zajeziti negativne vplive na okolje. Veliko lažje kot so lahko današnje razvite države, saj danes tudi Kitajci poznajo okoljske tehnologije, ki jih pred 100 ali 50 leti nismo poznali.

Svet je dinamičen. Leta 1890 je 90 odstotkov BDP predstavljalo kmetijstvo, danes pa 2-3 odstotke kmetov preživlja celo državo – zaradi enormnega povečanja produktivnosti kmetijske pridelave. Seveda, veliko stvari pri sodobni kmetijski proizvodnji je izjemno spornih in škodljivih, toda tudi za to se bo našla rešitev, če se bo dovolj ljudi ukvarjalo s tem problemom.

Meje rasti seveda vedno so in vedno bodo obstajale – zaradi omejitev na strani virov. Toda v dinamičnem svetu tehnološki napredek vedno znova najde bolj učinkovite metode za bolj učinkovit izkoristek omejenih virov. V vsaki dobi, tako pred 10.000 leti kot danes, pa nas je večina razmišljujočih vedno pesimistična glede možnosti nadaljevanja rasti. In prav je tako. Ker tako vedno aktivno iščemo bolj učinkovite metode oziroma odpiramo prostor zanje.

Toda bomo zato, ker trenutno ne vidimo poti naprej, rekli, da je rast nevarna? Svetujem, da si pogledate zelo poučen video Hansa Roslinga (ne se bati, zelo je socialen) o tem, kako je sta rast in razvoj prinesla tudi višjo kakovost življenja v razvite države in tudi v Kitajsko in ostale manj razvite države, ki so močno pridobile z globalizacijo. Videli boste tudi, kako se je rast na Japonskem zaustavila v 1990. letih. Poglejte si tudi njegovo predavanje o revščini in globalizaciji ter predavanje o rasti prebivalstva (priporočam predvsem Janezu Ščančarju).

Zaradi zasebne pobude na podlagi profitnega motiva se razvoj premika naprej. Če tega profitnega motiva ne bi regulirali, bi lahko imel zelo škodljive posledice.

Bomo rekli, da je kapitalizem kot tak škodljiv? Mnogi ste gorki kapitalizmu kot družbenemu redu, ki naj bi nas s pehanjem za dobički pripeljal do roba preživetja planeta. Veliko tega je res, vendar ni nujno povezano s kapitalizmom, pač pa z zlorabo moči. Moč pa imajo lahko vladarji, država ali tisti z veliko denarja. Država je lahko, v nerazvitih avtokratskih režimih ali nekdanjih polrazvitih socialističnih državah, enako okrutna glede zlorabe svoje moči in negativnega vpliva na okolje ali življenjske razmere ljudi kot denimo močni kapitalski lobiji v razvitih »kapitalističnih« državah. Zato pa potrebujemo tako demokracijo kot učinkovito regulacijo, da takšne zlorabe prepreči.

Kapitalizem sam po sebi ni nevaren. Kapitalizem ni nič drugega kot kombinacija osebne svobode posameznikov, zasebne lastnine, pravne države in trga. Zaradi zasebne pobude na podlagi profitnega motiva se razvoj premika naprej. Če tega profitnega motiva ne bi regulirali, bi lahko imel zelo škodljive posledice. Takšne, kot jih je prinesla deregulacija finančne industrije v ZDA v zadnjih treh desetletjih. Predlagam, da si – če še niste – pogledate dokumentarec Inside Job, ki opisuje sistemsko korupcijo, ki jo je sproducirala finančna industrija v ZDA ter njene rušilne posledice za ves svet. Zelo veliko pove tudi o mnogih skorumpiranih ekonomistih v ZDA, ki so se »prodali« finančni industriji. Toda to še ne pomeni, da je kapitalizem sam po sebi škodljiv. Pač pa, da vse dejavnosti potrebujejo določeno stopnjo regulacije, sicer podivjajo in povzročijo sistemski rizik za vse nas. (Mimogrede, ta teden bo objavljena moja recenzija (tudi na razgledi.net) Schumpetrove knjige Lahko kapitalizem preživi? Takrat bo mogoča poglobljena diskusija o tem).

Če se zaustavi ta mehanizem zasebne pobude in profitnega motiva, se zaustavi mehanizem kreativne destrukcije. Zaustavi se razvoj. In stotine milijonov ali milijarde ljudi lahko izgubi službe in eksistenco.

Ko razmišljate o razvoju oziroma o tem, kako bi omejili rast, zato razmišljajte tudi o posledicah. In odprte glave. Svet je dinamičen. Naše poznavanje naših potencialnih sposobnosti in zmožnosti pa je zelo majhno.

11 responses

  1. hja, in potem smo “konjski gnoj in smrad, ki sta pestila večino mest” zamenjali z drugim smradom … napredek pa tak!

  2. “Seveda, veliko stvari pri sodobni kmetijski proizvodnji je izjemno spornih in škodljivih, toda tudi za to se bo našla rešitev, če se bo dovolj ljudi ukvarjalo s tem problemom.”

    lepo da je jože p. optimist, vendar je današnje stanje rezultat tega, da se je “dovolj ljudi ukvarjalo s tem (prejšnjim) problemom”

  3. “… se zaustavi mehanizem kreativne destrukcije.”

    ne vem zakaj, ampak mene zadeva z rastjo bolj spominja na Ponzijeve piramidne sheme!?

  4. Bilo bi zares neumno zanikati pozitivne učinke rasti, predvsem na dvig standarda pri vseh kategorijah prebivalstva. Čeprav se nam vedno zdi, da smo nekoč živeli bolje, pa danes v razvitem svetu ljudje ne umirajo od lakote. Tudi kritika kapitalizma v celoti se mi ne zdi sprejemljiva, dokler ne najdemo neki boljši koncept – obstoječe alternative se niso ravno izkazale!

    Vseeno pa je avtor prevelik tehno-optimist. Ni dvoma, da tehnologija in znanost prinašata izboljšave v izkoristku energije. Odvisno od tipa energije se ti izkoristki že zdaj nahajajo nad 50%, prav tako mislim, da je vsakomur jasno, da izkoristek nikakor ne more biti večji od 100%. Doslej so bile omejitve pri rasti tehnološke narave, vedno bolj pa postajajo fizikalne narave – prišli smo namreč do meje, ki nam jo postavljajo naravni zakoni in preko njih tehnologija ne more.

    Najbolje je to očitno pri električni energiji; izkoristek pri proizvodnji in porabi električne energije je praktično že zelo blizu idealnega 100%; občutne izboljšave so možne samo še pri transportu, za kar pa potrebujemo superprevodnike pri sobni temperaturi in proizvodnji s sončnimi celicami. Po začetnem znanstvenem optimizmu pred 50 leti pa je jasno, da je rast nejvišje odkrite temperature superprevodnosti dosegla zasičenje.

    Ponavljam: izkoristek energije je v mnogih panogah v zadnjih desetletjih že dosegel saturacijo in je zelo nerealno pričakovati hitre in velike izboljšave.

  5. ob kopici bolj ali manj podobnih komentarjih, kot bi jih spisal sam in ob strinjanju z avtorjem, da se časi spreminjajo (in mi se spreminjamo z njimi?) se pri prejšnjem prispevku nisem javil. Žogico vračam avtorju s svojim stalnim temeljem, ko razmišljamo o “danes za jutri” ali poskušamo razložiti “današnje na podlagi včerašnjega”. Danes je eno in edino, kar zaznamuje planet, popoln pokol (človeški, nič zverinskega ni, kar bi pokol vsaj malo moralno opravičilo) divjega življenja, pridelava beljakovin za eksplozivno namnoženo človeško populacijo na farmah Ihan (metafora za človeško nagnusnost, ko pridela dvokilskega piščana do dveh kil v 20 dneh, žival pa nikoli ni videla ne neba ne pretegnila nog in,..kaj razlagama vsakega prebivalca planeta je nujno, nujno zapreti v tovrstne tovarne beljakovin za omenjenih 20 dni) in ponorelost nepovratno uničenih naravnih ekosistemov (mnogo od teg ane-nujno). En sam povratek na temelj tega kar sploh smo in kar imamo kot človekova družba zapisano v svojih etičnih (morala) kodeksih vso razmišljanje avtorja popolnoma drugače okviri. Šele potem se lahko manipulira z Malthusom (še zmeraj o njem razmišljamo samo tako, kot so nas naučili v SFRJ in nočemo videti striktno populacijske biologije v njegovih teorijah)..
    In da, človeška družba nikoli ni statična, kvaliteta japosnskega vsakdana ni kvalitetno nič manjša (nasprotno, je boljša) pa čeprav je ekonometrično japonska že desetletje ali več “nočna mora” teoretikov rasti številk. Skladno s tehnološkim napredkom bo raslo število ljudi, divjina in pravica življenja, da živi v njej je preteklik, ljudje pa bomo v svpjem početju tudi do sočloveka ostali nepredvidljivi.
    Ni se težko strinjati z avtorjevima obema zadnjima prispevkoma – sta pragmatična, vendar se izogibata tistega kar nas dela Človeka, najpreprostejše pravičnosti, ki se od Sokrata in Platona ni spremenila (zakaj že je pravično življenje v vsakem pogledu supriorno napram nepravičnemu?) se pa danes pri posamezniku pokaže skozi njegovo zmožnost samoomejevanja v smislu pustiti živeti drugemu in se zgroziti nad kolektivizmom osem milijardne množice, ki se brezglavo in brez zmernosti razmnožuje naprej ne, da bi zmogla videti vsaj kakšno kvaliteto ponuja svojim predebelim otrokom v njihovem življenju,..da ne omenim, da ima že z definicijo tega, kaj kvaliteta je velike težave.
    tega kar smo naredili brez boljših tehnoloških rešitev ne moremo popraviti. Trdno stojim za avtorjem v kontekstu, da rabimo več znanja.

  6. Ok – še enkrat, ker smo pri omenjanju predavanj itd. Dober predlog realnih sprememb v ekonomiji in opis stanja ter sistemske napake finančnega sistema podajata Nemca prof.dr. Huber in Senf:

    http://dai.ly/d651uC (nemščina)

    Ja, svet je dinamičen, tako kot vsak naravni sistem. Vendar pa to ne pomeni, da ne da obstajajo irreverzibilne spremembe, ko je vnovična vzpostavitev isto stabilnega sistema v krajšem času (čas ene človeške generacije)nemogoča.

    Zelo nazoren primer je lahko kar domač slovenski Kras,ki je zaradi vse večjega izkoriščanja gozdov v 19. stoletju ogolel in bi posledično tak, zaradi sprememnjenih razmer (veterna in vodna erozija itd.), še dolgo ostal, če ga ne bi po načrtih gozdarja Josipa Ressela okoli 1850 pogozdili s pionirsko vrsto – črnim borom. Hkrati pa so sprejeli ustrezno zakonsko regulativo, da se je gozd lahko začel ponovno vračati na izčrpana tla. In seveda, stabilen sistem se bo sedaj počasi vzpostavil nazaj, kar priča umikanje bora in pomladek hrasta, vendar pa to terja svoj čas.

    Od Ressela je že 162 let!!!!!, pa je naravni sistem komaj na začetku ustvarjanja bolj stabilne verzije le tega.

    V finančnem pogledu bi to bila zelooo dolgoročna naložba, saj bi “donose” v obliki stabilnosti (biološke varnosti) prejeli morda komaj čez 100-300 let. Kdo bi danes samo zaradi takšnega donosa vlagal v tako dolgoročen projekt?

    Sicer pa so tudi Habsburgi takrat pristopili le pragmatično in strateško, saj so potrebovali naravne vire za industrijo in vojsko. V tem primeru se je investicija v to pogozdovanje izkazala kod huda napaka, saj niso predvideli neslutenega tehnološkega razvoja, ki je les, kot strateški material za vojsko, umaknil iz uporabe.

    Dobra plat te zgodbe pa so seveda bori, ki so tu ostali in nas kulturno zaznamovali. Kosovela impresija borov pa je danes zopet dober opomin o nestabilnosti sistemov:

    Temni bori, črni bori,
    čuj, kako vršijo,
    ko da med seboj bolestno,
    tiho govorijo.

    Pod sekiro so sovražno
    včeraj bratje pali,
    danes in mogoče jutri
    bomo mi še stali.

    Silna burja, močna burja
    v bore zavihrala,
    ko da čula bi besede,
    pala in obstala.

    »Če umrete, bratje bori,
    kje se bom spočila,
    recite mi, dragi bratje,
    s kom bom govorila?

    Bratje bori, ostanite,
    rastite z uporom!«
    Pa so padali bolestno,
    nemo, bor za borom…

  7. Dobiček zaradi dobička je poguba; v skrajni konsekvenci bi, če bi ga striktno zasledovali, ostal na opustošeni Zemlji en sam človek. Dobiček naj bo stranski produkt dobrega gospodarjenja, upoštevajoč vse vidike zdržnosti Zemlje. Sicer pa sem se že leta 2004 ob bližajočih se volitvah, ko je bil minister za finance Mramor – potegoval se je za naslednji mandat, ko so bile v zraku podobne burne razprave o gospodarjenju – ekonomiki in ekonomiji v Sloveniji – začela razmišljati o denarju kot energiji . Tedaj so se tudi pojavili tkm. “mladoekonomisti” in dodobra razburkali razprave; nekateri so celo postali ministri, a so se kmalu, upravičeno”, upehali zaradi “kljukcev s figo v žepu” itd. Škoda! Bil je tudi čas, ko je poslanec Kelemina izračunal milijardno izgubo pri prodaji el. energije … in prišlo mi je na misel, da je denar energija … Zapisal se mi je dolg esej v obliki pisem prijatelju, ki sem ga strnila tudi v angleščini. Izhajala sem iz dolžine dneva, ki ima 24 ur in so ga “prijazni utopisti” za človekovo bivanje razdelili na 3 dele in sicer: 8 ur dela (vsega), 8 ur počitka in 8 ur sanjanja o lepšem svetu … Po tem načelu sem razdelila tudi dohodek posameznega delovnega človeka in sicer 1/3 naj ima zase, 1/3 vrača prejšnji generaciji in 1/3 daje naslednji generaciji. Od tiste svoje tretjine pa mora nameniti delež tudi za amortizacijo in varčevanje v skupni banki. Ta njegova 1/3 mora torej vsebovati tudi tim. “dobiček” ki ga hrani in nato investira sam ali z drugimi v novo. Iz tega sledi, da bi moral biti osebni dohodek vsakega zaposlenega v takšni višini, da bi zmogel pokrivati vse navedene postavke.

    Ljubljana, July 20, 2004

    To the anonymous one

    I would like to let you know about my endeavours to understand the nowadays economy.
    In addition, I also try to introduce into the economy the discoveries of new physics, of Zero Point Physics and the Wave Structure of Matter. I wrote part of this “essay” in July 2004. Since then, I have studied a large amount of different materials on this or similar subjects.

    Life is a thread.
    It winds on and off
    In the rhythm
    Of the breathing
    And beating.
    Ana M. Mayerhold, 1997

    I found out that my presumptions or my thinking of money to be the expression/substitution or even equivalent of/to energy and the question of righteousness of its distribution in the global economy in our time could be approved also with the theory of Wave Structure of Matter, or implicated to it. In my meditations I imagine exactly the same figure, namely the diagram that “shows how the Spherical In and Out Waves form a Standing Wave around the Wave-Center ‘particle’ ” , then also the model or graphic of motion that made late Walter Russel. You can find it in the article EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT REALITY (under the Zero Point Physics) on second page: “This fabulous graphic will prove invaluable to the development your understanding of those principal parameters of reality manipulable with zero point physics.” and also similar graphic on web page:

    I would neither neglect beside the Zero Point Physics also the Cellular Automata by Stephen Wolfram and his A New Kind of Science, Dr. Ed Fredkin’s metaphor … the most concrete thing in the world is information”, Frank Tipler in his The Physics of Immortality and Physics Near the Final State: God and the Resurrection of the Dead to Eternal Life, Dr. John A. Wheeler, the coiner of the term “Black Hole” and others (see the article by Kevin Kelly God is the Machine in Wired 10.12.) and for the recent “behaviour” in economy Vladimir Z. Nuri in his essay: FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING AS ECONOMIC PARASITISM – A Scientific, Mathematical & Historical Exposé, Critique, and Manifesto.

    I think that we most put a new rule, i.e.: It is not quantity that is important it is quality. The quantity and the quality are equal in the nature: the value of both is 0 or 1, /yes/no. What we could count is only the number of “scalar operations” necessary for the system in reaching the equilibrium.

    The question is: WHY NOT INTRODUCE NEW PHYSICS OR/AND WAVE STRUCTURE OF MATTER INTO ECONOMY? (And the value of bliss?)

    A part of my “essay” on July 2004:
    Since our last contact much has happened in the world, and as I am only the translator of the consciousness of the Mankind, it is nothing strange that Two Twins in New York City fell. There was too much dense concentration; high density of the vital energy transformed into the virtual capital/money in the form of the numbers/the quantities of money, the ghost capital circulating through the computers, e-mails, all crystals of silicium in the computers, electrical cables and the weight of the buildings as such in and on such a small surface. The Twins, they were the strongest magnets on the Earth. It didn’t matter who or what was piloting the airplanes. This magnet attracted them.
    Namely, since the year 1999 there is a group of people on the Earth who know what is going on. Maybe at first look it sounds very weird or mad/crazy or too potent. However, you must know that a Human is the Creator, and the Universe behaves as we figure out and on our command not vice versa. You and your colleagues in the world were trying to understand and to “calculate” the model of the Universe, since the beginning of all. Since Einstein, the world has rapidly changed into the wrong! Direction, but it was necessary and appropriate because the human consciousness had to rethink all possible variables of the relative theory and quantum mechanics through the man’s consciousness. However, it was wrong, also Newton was wrong, but it was necessary. The result is that the Universe was behaving that way and everything on the Earth and in the Universe was going wrong way. Why is it so? Until today, I presume that nobody has yet found out what really is the gravity. In my letters, I gave you a hint that the issue of too great greed of the humans has caused the errors on the Earth as a planet, the damage of/in the gravity. In addition, I presume that the Archimedes law has changed. The weight of the objects is not anymore equal to the weight of water of the cubature of the object; because of too much greed on this planet. This has a great impact on the Earth and on the whole Universe. Namely, the gravity is the accumulated vital energy in the storage battery, in the matter, the energy produced by life, because everything in the Universe becomes from life. There is nothing except life. D.H. Lawrence knew that and he was right as a poet (Phantasia of the Unconscious, Psychoanalysis and the Subconscious). Therefore, the gravity is the manifestation, materialization of the live energy. All energy is vital energy manifested on different levels in different forms of matter. The base is not the light, but the energy, and we must “measure” the energy, but not in horsepower, not in quantity but in quality. Nevertheless, how? The New Energy is not linear, the space and the time are illusions: it is scalar pulsing of waves and spherically expanding into all dimensions, is multi-dimensional into all directions out of the initial point 0, the generator of the vital energy with the highest consciousness – the human being at the top of rest living beings; the humans energize all supply of the energy moving through them. The energy flows outside from the zero and returns into zero in the rate of 3/3, three times 1/3. If the system is to be stable, there must be small difference between the vibration of similar energy coming out, and coming in. The growth of energy must be inside of the zero, then energy is getting better quality and is expanding and then the goodness is expanding. It is eternal balance, the dynamic statics; it definitely means the end of the dialectics; the end of the duality. If the output of energy is bigger then input then the system is going to collapse.

    This model of 3 x 1/3 we could find in every natural matter produced by living creatures and in the living bodies. That is behaving of the life pattern upon the Fibonacci’s line of numbers, number joke and it is: 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 , it is the vital spiral moving not in the linear way but as the densiting pulsation, the growth. A. Crawley said: “Zoroaster defines God as ‘having a spiral force’!” William Blake said: “Energy is eternal delight”. The Fibonacci’s line is growing in the rate number Ф = 1.618 and its value is 1/1.618 = 0.6180469, i.e. cca 2/3 = 0.666666666 (Sic!).. The 3rd 1/3 is for densiting of the substance/matter to form the sphere. It means that everything is moving in the rhythm: two steps forward, one step backward.

    Energy is money and vice versa, Money is Energy because of the greatest developments of the technology of the mankind it is now clear, that the energy is today expressed with money. What is it really? The capital is accumulated vital energy, the energy produced by living beings; it is the vital substance of the mankind, the vital energy, the so-called New Energy. Gold is not anymore the basic value for the value of money. It is not, anymore, because whole quantity of the gold in the Universe is 1. Today’s capital manifested in money is not equal to the vital energy accumulated in gold. The capital is too high and is lofty; there is no substance under it. Into the virtual amount of the capital is virtually stored too much vital energy without being produced. However, someone has to produce it. Such lofty capital works and sucks vital energy of human beings that has been spent in advance. In addition, each next investment on ghost money means fading out of life on the earth. Being aware or not, the capital, the money is the expression, the manifestation or materialization of the vital force/energy of human beings. Par example: the Egyptian pyramids are very dense concentration of vital force; they are the storehouse of the vital energy until today. They were very, very strong magnet, but natural magnet. Africa is dieing because there is sucking out the vital energy of African people more then they could produce. Africans are Earth’s gardeners. The other part of the world has pumped almost all vital energy from Africans, the pyramids can not be refilled adequately so they don’t emit energy back and Africa is dying; this is the cause of AIDS disease. Most people are so deprived of vital energy, because we prevent them and stopped them to dream in the awake state, to imagine. The imagination and the poiesis are the most precious force and the biggest force in the universe, it is the Spirit (spiral, breathing), and it is the spin. Africans and Africa don’t breathe anymore. Where is the solution? The solution is paradox ally: give Africa peace, not in the sense of peace or war, but let her be alone. Let her be alone, Africa must take a rest. Any kind of help from outside is more harmful to the people of Africa. The most dangerous are the medical drugs from the so-called developed world. Give Africa peace to be able to start and begin breathing again. Otherwise the Earth will die. And not only Africa …

    If we could in the frame of the world, of the Earth implement the principle of 3/3 into the economy of the world; it means to share the capital/the salaries or income of each living being into 1/3 x 3 ratios, then we could make the quantum leap into the dynamic pulsing statics. Moreover, the Earth would breathe with whole lungs again and people and the plants and the animals. The Sun energy is coming from the vital energy from the Earth. However, the Sun is becoming exhausted, because the current of the vital Energy from the Earth is weaker and weaker. Because of that there are on the Sun eruptions more strong and in the shorter intervals; the Sun is burning his storage energy, the supply and becomes more and more dangerous because the spectrum of the Light is changing. In addition, the Light comes from the Earth; it is the vital energy changing in the Sun into the Light falling to the Earth and expanding elsewhere. The source of the Light is the Earth. Each star, planets or any heaven’s body are the accumulated vital energy. That means that the source of the Life is one, or that on these planets or stars which have the matter, the density of the matter is related with the accumulated vital energy and their weight depends on that and the value of their gravity is equal to it. This is the gravity, the forth force/energy of the Universe. Nevertheless, the energy is one and the source of all energies is vital force generated from life, energized by source of energy – the life, the humans, and the living beings.

    The final issue of this 3 x 1/3 principle, that means dividing or distributed capital – money, i.e. vital energy (salaries) first regarding on so closed outer circulation as follows:

    3 x (1/3 x t) + 1 = 4.
    E(T) = Art

    It is very simple pattern and it is the basic code of the entire Universe.

    We have a certain quantity of money, i.e. energy produced by one entity 0. The energy that this entity has “produced” through living, through life is then divided into three “circles” outside of 0. The entity:
    1/3 gives back to the environment, i.e. par example to the state as the taxes
    1/3 keeps for himself
    1/3 puts into the bank for the supply.
    (It is not the capital that circulates, but the human, vital energy).

    This model is repeated also inside of the entity 0, the energy that runs into the circle.
    The 1/3 of the initial energy that the entity keeps for himself becomes for him the value 1; it becomes the new entity of the energy. He divides it upon the same model 3 x 1/3:
    1/3 gives back to the parents and the ancestors (for the graveyards, his help for the elders etc.) Inside of his family; could be in money or even better with his labour, assistance to the parents); 1/3 keeps for everyday life for himself and the family, for running expenses;
    1/3 he stores in for the supply. We must take into the consideration also time, thus:
    3 x 1/3 x t + 1 = 4.

    It has to be noticed that on such division of salaries each entity, worker has all infrastructure for free and all education and health care is free for all. The situation in most so called developed countries is that only 10 % of salaries or money/energy is left to each worker instead of 33 % what is my proposal.

    The outside quantity/quality of the energy, the tension, the degree or the level of the vibration running back into the entity 0, must not differentiates too much, the difference must not be too great. Otherwise, the initial entity 0, the human being cannot accept it, energizes it, and is going to fade out. Upon the rule or the principle of the osmoses, the liquid from the lower concentration through semi-conductive membrane has tendency to run into the space of the higher concentration. It is the same thing with the energy, because all is energy; after the analogy the more concentrated, the bigger capital attracts more capital. It acts as a magnet, attractor. Since most states or countries are richer in all senses as the average inhabitant, the states are spending too much for their basic running, the state officers are too rich, the politicians take too much energy but they don’t energize it adequately, the 0 entity, the majority of inhabitants of the state are on much lower energy level, and cannot assimilate the energy coming back to them from the outside circles, they cannot have their share at the “wealth of the state” … of the infrastructure, or social care, education etc., because they should be on a little bit higher!!! Energetic level to be able to give it the spin, to be able to energize the vital energy from their environment. The energy must circulate balanced to be properly energized. The inhabitants who are on the higher level are constantly pumping the vital energy or they are the constant attractors for the energy and it doesn’t matter if they are aware that they are richer of the rest of the people in their country; they cannot do anything. Even the social care or the caritas actions cannot give the spin to the poor people. From that reason all the aid to Africa is in vain, it even makes the situation much more disastrous. The poor are so weak that they cannot energize the necessary energy for themselves and for the Earth anymore. Therefore, the all system fades out. The Universe is expanding because it becomes lighter and lighter, the gravity is becoming weaker because the life on the Earth is bleeding. The plants cannot supply enough energy, because the human energy is necessary. The humans energized the energy mostly and they are at the end of the system, because of their high, the highest consciousness. The level of the consciousness defines the capacity of the energizing energy. This is the Energy of the entire Universe. We must know that time and space are illusions; they are the construct of the mind of the humans to be able to orient themselves in and to create the virtually 3-D Universe.
    The generators, the energizers of the energy are human beings, if the conduct runs not balanced, unbalanced, if the people are giving more than receiving, the energy is going to be smaller, and smaller. After the critical point, the damage is so great that there is no energy in the environment that could heal such system. The exhausted entity cannot accept, receive the energy from the outside. We must slowly allow the entity to recover by himself. It is enough to stop running energy from inside out and spending it wastefully. It means the state must immediately stop spending spend the new energy; the state must make the leap, the quantum leap into the new model of economy, i.e. 3 x 1/3. Moreover, most important condition is that IMF immediately deletes all debts of all countries in the world and that must do all states and all local banks in the world. It is necessary to the system to becoming more stable and to recover from energy defiance.

    The issue of this model or the exact equation is:

    3 x (1/3 x t) + 1 = 4
    A)
    3 divided by 3: each 1/3 becomes the new entity as wholeness with the value 1. It is the leap from the quantity into the quality, but not in the sense of measurement but in the sense of the quality/function as the whole- as the new entity.
    So: the result of 3 x 1/3 is 3 and not 1. The energy runs or pulses in three different circles. The new quality is then the new wholeness, it is the new entity, when these 3 entities of the energy are energized by the entity 0, and they become 1. This we add to previous 3 entities and we have the result 4. In the other sense: at the beginning, we had two entities, i.e. the entity 0 and the environment. At the end, we have the value 4. It is the result of adding but the new quantity, i.e. quality is the different energy, it went through circles and was energized by the entity 0 and its spin is greater. This is the exact model, exact code of the Universe. Universe then breathes balanced and is pulsing. Paradox ally: THE EARTH IS THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE. SHE, GAIA IS THE SOURCE OF THE LIFE, OF THE ENERGY …LIFE IS ETERNAL DELIGHT, AND ENERGY IS ETERNAL DELIGHT. The Universe is alive and God is alive; he breathes and walks on the Earth.

    With such distribution of money/energy each and every human being will live on proper and sound way, i.e.: in 24 hours he will work 8 hours, rest 8 hours and dream, meditate and imagine better and more beautiful world – 8 hours.
    Probably it will take thousand years for the system to be recovered. However, we must at least start.
    I am right. Now there are too much dead people on Gaia, killed without graves and without names or living zombies, empty batteries. The consequence is that there is too much vital energy outside of the Earth and we cannot reach it. Outside, there is great quantity of knowledge, the human supply of knowledge – the culture. GAIA is dieing. Please, help and stop it.

    SO now, we have the Code 0 of the Universe:

    E = (1/e + 1/e + 1/e)t + 1 e = 4 E
    E = 3et + 1e = 4E
    2e quad = 4 E

    With kind regards and wishing you all the best,

    Lovingly yours,

    ©Ana Marija Mayerhold

    P.S.
    The fundamental character of human being is to imagine, to meditate, to dream – it is certainly not to work or to entertain to be able to work more. The Imagination is woman and The Fulfilment is man, she is knowledge, he has knowledge! In each woman, there is a man and in each man, there is a woman. The divine marriage between them is inside of every person and it is called hieros gamos. Carl Jung named it the marriage between anima and animus.. The result is: individuation, individuality but the next step is universality.

    Ana

    P.P.S.
    I would like to add my share to the Thing. I am convinced that it is not the smallest one. It is not to neglect; cooperate, please. I know I am on the right path.
    I would like to add the following statements.
    1. The primary “force” or the source of the Universe is the god’s/human’s intent/will to be, i.e. to act; to love/evol and it is Energy! “Love is law, law under will”: Aleister Crowley. To intent is already to act, to act with word, to speak is already the act = energy.
    2. Let me write down the beginning of the gospel of John:
    “In the beginning was the Word /the Wor(l)d/ , and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being. What has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it.” (John 1.1.-1.5).
    The word – Gk eiro (speak): e is energy, i is speaking person. The word OM is a u m, it means a in M, the breath into Materia, AUM = OM; O=0, o is all embracing within the circle, is all what is and zero in the same time. Each entity is zero entity; each being is zero being and is the source of all what is. He/she is the pulsing energy, zero, 0 but as unique entity is 1 among other 1s.
    We must make a shift from so called numeric Qabala to phonetic Qabala; the vocals: a, e, i, o, u and r denote the “content”, the consonants denote the “the way/the nature of the motion”. Per example: the father-god of the supreme Sumerian god Marduk was Ea: E always means Energy and a always means the prime materialized source of the Universe the Sound a; the prime Breath/Spirit. Or let us take the word Ra: R,r always means rotation, the issue is life; a is the breath or pure sound A. EROS = E is Energy, r is rotation, o is all embracing or 0, s is spirit – Phi spiral.
    Ana M. Mayerhold
    Ljubljana, 8-23–2004

  8. @Irska
    Dali ste nazoren primer posegov v naravo in ohranjanja naravnih virov. Ali je bilo kdaj obdobje, ko človek ni prekomerno ropal naravo? Že v stari Perziji je zaradi zoroastrskega čaščenja najvišjega boga Ahura Mazda povsod, v vsaki hiši in javnem prostoru ter seveda vtempljih gorel ogenj, tako da so posekali vsa drevesa in nastale so puščave, ki so še danes. Potem ko so truplo pokojnika najprej izpostavili pticam in mravljam so nato ostanke, pretežno kosti, zažgali, za kar so spet potrebovali les. Tudi v Indiji lahko danes le premožnejši upepelijo preminule svojce, saj morajo les kupiti in drago plačati; drevesa pa padajo. Beseda kultura izvira iz besede kult, kar pomeni nego, negovanje, zato je v začetkih poljedeljstva obdelovanje zemlje in pridelovanje rastlin bilo negovanje v nasprotju z današnjo prakso: ropanjem. Res je, današnji človek najprej vse zastrupi potem pa poje vse živo in mrtvo, četudi je strupeno in skoraj neužitno. Takšni postajamo tudi sami, strupeni in neužitni. H Kosovelovi prelepi pesmi o borih pa še moja “pesemca” “Drevo”.

    Drevo, beseda, človek – trije samotarji.
    Kot indijanski deček stojiš, drevo, v zarji.
    Ljubim te nago, se kriveče in izmučeno.
    V svojem zavetišču skrivaš ljubezen in
    smrt,
    strast na nočnem prizorišču.
    Veter poklekne pred tvoja vrata,
    ko se zemlja ljubi z radostjo
    in nebo spi z večnostjo.
    Ponosno drevo, ki daješ zvezdam rdeče
    odseve.
    Pozabljeni bogovi s teboj spregovorijo,
    ko se sapa dviga iz spečega gozda
    in se spomin vrne v tisočletja.
    Tiho rasteš.
    Kdaj sem zadnjič splezala nate,
    s prsti vetra v laseh?
    V brezbrežja hrepenim s teboj, drevo.
    Nocoj je čudno dober večer
    in pozabila bom na stvari tega sveta.
    Vrnila se bom v skrivnost s teboj, drevo.
    Osamljeno molčiš, velikan.
    Himen skrivnosti zakrvavi
    in visok nenadoma uplahneš kakor
    jadro.
    Utrujeni mož se na večer vrača domov.
    Na rami nese sekiro.
    S teboj bom, drevo.
    Smo peli poeti Slo-Vene: (z)Ve-neti.

  9. Moji dami (spoštljivo), tokrat, leta 2011, gre za popolnoma drugačno kvantiteto, čeprav je kvaliteta (uničevanje) enaka. Pozabljata na najhujše, popoln pokol oz. genocid nad divjim življenjem. Pomislita na karizmatično makrofauno, tako je predstava najlažja. Je nepovraten in ga nobeden črni bor ne revitalizira. kras je mogoče bil na dobri poti, vendar se vrača (pospešeno) v obdobje sekanja, koz in ovac. A izdahnemo kakšno o Amazonskem pragozdu? Genocid, kot del darwinsitične evolucije?

  10. Edina stalnica zivljenja je nenehno spreminjanje in razvijanje.

    od kamna do kladiva, od kladiva dalje..
    od pesacenja do aviona…
    od napol strinoznih opic do mondenih pist raznoraznih izborov missic in missov…
    od risanja na kamen in graviranja v kamen do PC-ja…
    Zaustaviti dinamiko razvoja bi ze kratkorocno to pomenilo smrt in stagnacijo.

    Kapital v sluzbi cloveka, jA, ne pa clovek v sluzbi kapitala, ki ga izzeme do konca in razcloveci.

  11. ok – tokrat malo manj poezije in več politike – JUTRI pravi izziv za Jožeta:

    KDAJ: v sredo, 26. oktobra 2011, od 13:30 do 17:30
    KJE: sedež Gospodarske zbornice Slovenije (Dimičeva 12, Ljubljana)

    Panelna razprava Dovolj količine, več kakovosti
    ► Matjaž Hanžek
    ► dr. Luka Omladič
    ► Dušan Semolič, Zveza svobodnih sindikatov Slovenije (ZSSS)
    ► Anton Peršak, član sveta za trajnostni razvoj
    ► dr. Aleksandar Kešeljević, Ekonomska fakulteta Ljubljana
    ► mag. Marjana Dermelj, Služba vlade RS za razvoj in evropske zadeve (

    Ključna vprašanja:
    Kakšen bi moral biti naš razvoj, da bi omogočal kakovostno življenje, obenem pa bi ostal znotraj družbenih in okoljskih meja? Ali je nenehna gospodarska rast sploh mogoča? Ali je neenakomerna porazdelitev dohodkov lahko pravična? Ali obstaja političen model, ki bi zagotovil, da bi vlade delale za ljudi, ne pa kapital?
    15:15 – 15:30 Odmor
    15:30 – 17:30 Panelna razprava Predvolilni pogledi strank na razvojne izzive Slovenije:
    ► predstavnik Zares, Bogdan Biščak
    ► predstavnik LDS, Tomaž Orešič
    ► predstavnika DESUS, Janez Benčina in Saša Geržina
    ► predstavnik SLS, Franc Bogovič
    ► predstavnica TRS, Hermina Krt
    ► predstavnik SMS, Darko Krajnc
    ► predstavnik SDS, Žiga Turk
    ► predstavnik/ca SD*
    ► predstavnik/ca SNS*

    To bo zabava. Mislim, da bi bil Damijanov prispevek kar dober uvod v razpravo…

%d bloggers like this: