Zelo preprost odgovor na to vprašanje je: Ker so KItajci naredili odprtokodni sistem za razvoj UI in ker so bolj odprti do aplikacij UI, zato bodo te aplikacije bolj široko vpeljali in uporabili. Arnaud Bertrand je bil v spodnjem komentarju članka v Financial Timesu glede tega zelo plastičen: iznajdba parnega stroja sama po sebi ni bila nič posebnega, kar jo je naredilo pomembno, je aplikacija parnega stroja v industriji in transportu, kar je povzročilo industrijsko revolucijo in omogočilo Britaniji, da se je gospodarsko izjemno razvila in pridobila prednost pred vsemi ostalimi.
This is rare enough to be highlighted: an actually good Financial Times article on the state of the AI “race” between the U.S. and China.
Three interesting points that stood out to me:
1) The fact that “for a general-purpose technology such as AI, long-term advantage often comes down to how widely and deeply technologies spread across society.”
This is because, at the risk of pointing the obvious, benefits from a new technology come from using it widely, not just creating it. You wouldn’t get any benefit from discovering the steam engine in and of itself: what drove productivity gains (and ultimately Britain’s advantage in the industrial revolution) was spreading and using this technology in its society.
And China has advantages here, as the article notes, since they’re unarguably better at orchestrating society-wide transformation, as that’s all they’ve been doing for the past 3 decades.
You must be logged in to post a comment.