The only way humanity has a chance of avoiding a climate disaster will be through a global plan based on common ownership of resources and technology that replaces the capitalist market system. In a new book by Scottish Marxist economists Paul Cockshott, Alin Cottrell, and Jan Philip Dapprich, entitled Economic Planning in an Age of Climate Crisis, the authors take up this issue.
Over the years, Cockshott and Cottrell have done sterling and important work in showing that planning in a non-capitalist economy is feasible and would work so much more effectively than the capitalist market economy. In this new book, the authors go further to show how planning is vitally necessary if the disasters of climate change, already with us, are to be mitigated and the planet is no longer degraded by greenhouse gas emissions. And they spell out how planning by replacing the market would work.
The…
View original post 1,109 more words
DAMIJAN blog 
Še en prispevek “koristnih idiotov (ni mišljeno kot osebna žalitev).
Preden razviješ kakršnokoli teorijo, je treba preveriti hipotezo oz. predpostavke. To je osnova znanstvene metode.
In vsa ta horda “zemljebrižnikov” slepo sledi narativu “man-made climate change”, ne da bi se vprašala kako smo prišli do teh “ugotovitev”,
-na kakšnih predpostavkah so narejeni klimatski modeli, oz. ali so parametri teh modelov – climate sensitivity na CO2 ustrezni.
– kakšna je zgodovinska uspešnost teh modelov (imamo jih od začetka 80-tih let in vsi po vrsti do zadnjega so “too hot”, niti eden od njih!!! ni validiran, kar pomeni, da je sposoben pojasniti, globalno ohlajanje v 2.pol 20-stoletja do konca 70-tih, kljub naraščajočemu CO2 ), da ostalih fenomenov v zadnjih tisočletjij dokumentirane človeške zgodovine (izmenjavanje super solar minimum-a in toplih obdobij, niti ne omenjamo.
– ne vemo niti (poleg climate sensitivity CO2) ali je povečanje CO2 vzrok ali posledica. Obstajajo cele geološke epohe za katere ni nikakršne korelacije med CO2 in vremenom oz. kjer CO2 sledi spremembam vremena in ne obratno
– da je vreme kaotičen sistem, ki ga niti v zadostni meri ne razumemo niti nimamo (cel svet) računalniških kapacitet, da bi to lahko izračunali, tudi, če bi bil naš model bistveno bolj popoln. Tisti, ki razumejo kaj pomeni kaotična narava sistema, jim bo to takoj jasno.
– da je morebitno segrevanje (mogoče je ohlajanje bistveno bolj verjetno) izjemno ugodno za civilizacijo. Povečane temperature in CO2 pomeni učinkovitejšo fotosintezo, ugodnejše pogoje za rast zelenih rastlin (predvsem poljščin), povečano vlago (zaradi izhlapevanja) in umikanje puščav (zaradi večje odpornosti rastlin na sušo ob večjem CO2).
Kot je rekel znameniti Prof. Svensmark, ki je odkril vpliv kozmičnega sevanja na oblikovanje oblakov (projekti CLOUD v CERN-u in predhodno SKY na Danskem) in s tem na albedo (ki ima za par magnitud večji vpliv na vreme kot “trace gas” kar CO2 nedvomno je)
“V LINIJI TISOČEV RODOV ČLOVEŠTVA, SMO EDINA GENERACIJA, KI SE BOJI TOPLEGA OBDOBjA”
Bojim se, da pelje ta man-made climate change histerijo v nov totalitarizem. Izgovor za kakršnokoli omejevanje človeške svobode na račun “višjih intersov”. V ta totalitarizem grejo naivne mase, kot lemingi v ocean. Kot podgane, ki sledijo čarobnemu Piskaču.
POT V PEKEL JE TLAKOVANA Z DOBRIMI NAMENI!
Da bo bolj jasno poslušajmo Maurice Strong-a:
In the May 1990 issue of WEST magazine, Maurice Strong (architect of UN Agenda 21, Undersecretary of UN, co-founder of the World Economic Forum, Secretary General of the June 1972 Stockholm Earth Day Conference, and trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation) gave an interview titled “The Wizard of the Baca Grande.” On the last page of this interview is written the following:
“Strong tells me he has often wished he could write. He has a novel he’d like to do. It’s something he has been thinking about for a decade. It would be a cautionary tale about the future. Each year, he explains as background to the telling of the novel’s plot, the World Economic Forum convenes in Davos, Switzerland. Over a thousand CEOs, prime minsters, finance ministers, and leading academics gather in February to attend meetings and set economic agendas for the year ahead. With this as a setting, he then says: ‘What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it?’…The man who founded the United Nations Environment Program and who wrote parts of the Brundtland Report and who in 1992 will try to get the world’s leaders, meeting in Brazil, to sign just such an agreement, savors the questions hanging in the air. Will they do it? Will the rich countries agree to reduce their impact on the environment? Will they agree to save the earth?
…Strong resumes his story. ‘The group’s conclusion is “no”. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change’… [Thus] ‘This group of world leaders,’ he continues, ‘form a secret society to bring about an economic collapse…They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodity and stock markets…in order to save the planet, the group decides: ISN’T THE ONLY HOPE FOR THE PLANET THAT THE INDUSTRIALIZED CIVILIZATIONS COLLAPSE? ISN’T IT OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO BRING THAT ABOUT?’”
Thus, the question is, ARE YOU WILLING TO BE SACRIFICED to the false gods of the WEF’s Green Agenda?
Všeč mi jeVšeč mi je