Kitajski odgovor na ameriško provokacijo

Kitajski odgovor na ameriško provokacijo glede Tajvana bo … “kitajski”. Dolgoročen in ne kratkoročen, strateški in ne taktičen. Seveda kratkoročno bo Kitajska Tajvan pomorsko in zračno izolirala, kar pomeni izpad tajvanskih komponent, predvsem čipov za zahodna podjetja. In kontejnerske ladje bodo morale pluti po daljši poti – okrog Tajvana in ne skozi tajvansko ožino. Toda to so malenkosti, čeprav bodo kratkoročno zaradi disrupcij dobavnih verig prizadele zahodne države (zaustavitve proizvodnje, pomanjkanje dobrin, inflacija…). Toda zares pomemben je dolgi rok.

S tajvansko provokacijo so ZDA sprožile “dan D” za formalni začetek konca ameriške globalne hegemonije. S tem dejanjem so Kitajsko potisnile, da začne z oblikovanjem nove globalne gospodarske, politične in varnostne arhitekture. Ta arhitektura bo izgrajena okrog BRICS+ skupine držav, ki kontrolirajo večino ključnih surovin, okrog nove košarice valut in kasnejše nove globalne rezervne valute.

Velika večina ljudi se niti ne zaveda, kaj se je zgodilo in kaj to dolgoročno pomeni. O nekompetentnosti ameriškega političnega establishmenta ne bom izgubljal besed. Zaradi degeneracije in nekompetentnosti propadajo imperiji.

Spodaj je najboljši opis tega, kar se je pravkar zgodilo in kar se bo. Pepe Escobar:

No “Pearl Harbor moment”

Now compare it with hundreds of millions of Chinese who are not on Twitter but on Weibo, and a leadership in Beijing that is impervious to western-manufactured pre-war, post-modern hysteria.

Anyone who understands Chinese culture knew there would never be a “missile on a Kabul balcony” moment over Taiwanese airspace. There would never be a replay of the perennial neocon wet dream: a “Pearl Harbor moment.” That’s simply not the Chinese way.

The day after, as the narcissist Speaker, so proud of accomplishing her stunt, was awarded the Order of Auspicious Clouds for her promotion of bilateral US-Taiwan relations, the Chinese Foreign Minister issued a sobering comment: the reunification of Taiwan with the mainland is a historical inevitability.

That’s how you focus, strategically, in the long game.

What happens next had already been telegraphed, somewhat hidden in a Global Times report. Here are the two key points:

Point 1: “China will see it as a provocative action permitted by the Biden administration rather than a personal decision made by Pelosi.”

That’s exactly what President Xi Jinping had personally told the teleprompt-reading White House tenant during a tense phone call last week. And that concerns the ultimate red line.

Xi is now reaching the exact same conclusion reached by Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier this year: the United States is “non-agreement capable,” and there’s no point in expecting it to respect diplomacy and/or rule of law in international relations.

Point 2 concerns the consequences, reflecting a consensus among top Chinese analysts that mirrors the consensus at the Politburo: “The Russia-Ukraine crisis has just let the world see the consequence of pushing a major power into a corner… China will steadily speed up its process of reunification and declare the end of US domination of the world order.”

Chess, not checkers

The Sinophobic matrix predictably dismissed Xi’s reaction to the fact on the ground – and in the skies – in Taiwan, complete with rhetoric exposing the “provocation by American reactionaries” and the “uncivilized campaign of the imperialists.”

This may be seen as Xi playing Chairman Mao. He may have a point, but the rhetoric is pro forma. The crucial fact is that Xi was personally humiliated by Washington and so was the Communist Party of China (CPC), a major loss of face – something that in Chinese culture is unforgivable. And all that compounded with a US tactical victory.

So the response will be inevitable, and it will be classic Sun Tzu: calculated, precise, tough, long-term and strategic – not tactical. That takes time because Beijing is not ready yet in an array of mostly technological domains. Putin had to wait years for Russia to act decisively. China’s time will come.

For now, what’s clear is that as much as with Russia-US relations last February, the Rubicon has been crossed in the US-China sphere.

The price of collateral damage

The Central Bank of Afghanistan bagged a paltry $40 million in cash as ‘humanitarian aid’ soon after that missile on a balcony in Kabul.

So that was the price of the Al-Zawahiri operation, intermediated by the currently US-aligned Pakistani intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). So cheap.

The MQ-9 Reaper drone carrying the two Hellfire R9X that killed Al-Zawahiri had to fly over Pakistani airspace – taking off from a US base in the Persian Gulf, traversing the Arabian Sea, and flying over Balochistan to enter Afghanistan from the south. The Americans may have also got human intelligence as a bonus.

A 2003 deal, according to which Islamabad facilitates air corridors for US military flights, may have expired with the American withdrawal debacle last August, but could always be revived.

No one should expect a deep dive investigation on what exactly the ISI – historically very close to the Taliban – gave to Washington on a silver platter.

Dodgy dealings

Cue to an intriguing phone call last week between the all-powerful Chief of Staff of the Pakistani Army, Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa, and US deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman. Bajwa was lobbying for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to release a crucial loan at the soonest, otherwise Pakistan will default on its foreign debt.

Were deposed former Prime Minister Imran Khan still in power, he would never have allowed that phone call.

The plot thickens, as Al-Zawahiri’s Kabul digs in a posh neighborhood is owned by a close advisor to Sirajuddin Haqqani, head of the “terrorist” (US-defined) Haqqani network and currently Taliban Interior Minister. The Haqqani network, needless to add, was always very cozy with the ISI.

And then, three months ago, we had the head of ISI, Lieutenant General Nadeem Anjum, meeting with Biden’s National Security Advisor  Jake Sullivan in Washington – allegedly to get their former, joint, covert, counter-terrorism machinery back on track.

Once again, the only question revolves around the terms of the “offer you can’t refuse” – and that may be connected to IMF relief. Under these circumstances, Al-Zawahiri was just paltry collateral damage.

Sun Tzu deploys his six blades

Following Speaker Pelosi’s caper in Taiwan, collateral damage is bound to multiply like the blades of a R9-X missile.

The first stage is the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) already having engaged in live fire drills, with massive shelling in the direction of the Taiwan Strait out of Fujian province.

The first sanctions are on too, against two Taiwanese funds. Export of sable to Taiwan is forbidden; sable is an essential commodity for the electronics industry – so that will ratchet up the pain dial in high-tech sectors of the global economy.

Chinese CATL, the world’s largest fuel cell and lithium-ion battery maker, is indefinitely postponing the building of a massive $5 billion, 10,000-employee factory that would manufacture batteries for electric vehicles across North America, supplying Tesla and Ford among others.

So the Sun Tzu maneuvering ahead will essentially concentrate on a progressive economic blockade of Taiwan, the imposition of a partial no-fly zone, severe restrictions of maritime traffic, cyber warfare, and the Big Prize: inflicting pain on the US economy.

The War on Eurasia

For Beijing, playing the long game means the acceleration of the process involving an array of nations across Eurasia and beyond, trading in commodities and manufactured products in their own currencies. They will be progressively testing a new system that will see the advent of a BRICS+/SCO/Eurasia Economic Union (EAEU) basket of currencies, and in the near future, a new reserve currency.

The Speaker’s escapade was concomitant to the definitive burial of the “war on terror” cycle and its metastasis into the “war on Eurasia” era.

It may have unwittingly provided the last missing cog to turbo-charge the complex machinery of the Russia-China strategic partnership. That’s all there is to know about the ‘strategic’ capability of the US political ruling class. And this time no missile on a balcony will be able to erase the new era.

Vir: Pepe Escobar, The Cradle

2 responses

  1. Pozabljamo, da je Tajvan razdeljena družba in da je pol populacije blizu nekdanjemu Kuomintang-u. Znotraj stranke Kuomintang, ki je dolga desetletja vodila Tajvan, se je pred kratkim zgodil hud boj za prevlado kjer je pro-kitajska stran za las izgubila. Ne pozabimo, da je velik del populacije prišel na otok po 1949 in da ima Kitajske korenine. Kljub ideološkim razlikam so verjetno nemalo ponosni ne samo na tajvanski temveč tudi na kitajski vzpon. Navsezadnje Kuomintang je bila zgodovinsko stranka kitajskih nacionalistov.

    Vsi poznamo Tajvan kot izvoznico čipov s tem, da se malo ljudi zaveda kako zelo je Tajvan vpet v trgovino s Kitajsko. Glej:

    Taiwan is completely dependent on trade with China, thus, if China really wanted to cause Taiwan’s “submission” to China, there would be no need to “invade” Taiwan, they would simply stop trading with Taiwan. China makes up 49.04% of Taiwan exports and 23.8% of Taiwan imports.

    Kitajska ne bo ovirala razvoja Tajvan-a ker preko njega srka zahodno tehnologijo. Quote izpred 3 let:

    More than 3,000 semiconductor engineers have left Taiwan for new jobs on the mainland China . The recent departure was so significant that it’s equivalent to 10% of all chip engineers on the island.

    “Chinese players are now trying to overcome the barrier by recruiting not only top executives, but entire production teams on the ground,” a Taiwanese industry insider said. “They are paying two to three times as much as Taiwanese companies.”

  2. Eden bolj poglobljenih/razširjenih komentarjev iz strani zanimivega kanala na YT. Resda nisem šel preverjati vseh virov o podatkih ki jih navaja… npr. v zvezi s surovinami in materiali (npr. redkimi kovinami in podmorskega peska ki vsebuje veiko silicija) za izdelavo visokotehnoloških izdelkov, ki jih Kitajska izvaža Zahodu. Kljub temu, vseeno zelo zanimiv komentar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kw5EDAVHZFM&t=645s

%d bloggers like this: