Covid epidemija: Iluzija, da jo je mogoče spraviti pod nadzor?

Vem, da je nehvaležno objavljati heretične stvari glede na prevladujoče stanje informacij, duha in pristopa, pa vendar je potrebno podati tudi drugačna mnenja, ki pa so lahko zelo relevantna. Spodaj navajam povzetek oziroma letni obračun situacije glede boja proti Covid epidemiji s strani neodvisne preiskovalne skupine, združene na portalu Swiss Policy Research (SPR). Že celo leto konsistentno objavljajo analize, ki porajajo dvome v učinkovitost prevladujočih vladnih ukrepov za zajezitev Covid epidemije. S klikom na spodnje povezave pridete do posamičnih analiz. Vredno je prebrati in si ustvariti lastno mnenje.

Iluzorno je namreč verjeti, da nas bo 16.5 milijard evrov, ki jih je Evropska komisija namenila za draga cepiva proti Covid, rešilo pred tretjim valom epidemije in trajajočimi zapiranji javnega življenja in gospodarstva. Pri čemer pa si še ne moremo niti predstavljati vsega obsega socialnih in ekonomskih stroškov nadaljevanja teh ukrepov. Medtem pa obstajajo že znane zelo učinkovite metode za prevencijo ali zgodnje zdravljenje okuženih s Covid, ki jih mnogi zdravniki in zdravstvene ustanove redno uporabljajo. Problem teh metod in zdravil je v tem, da so “preveč poceni” rešitev problema.

sweden-eu-usa-dpm

As the above chart shows, covid deaths in Sweden – without lockdown, without mask mandate, and with one of the lowest ICU capacities in Europe – are almost identical to the EU average and significantly lower than in the US. In other words, the many measures proposed by supposed experts have been largely ineffective medically, but highly destructive socially and economically.

The only effective intervention to reduce severe disease and deaths – absent early border controls or all-out totalitarian policies – has been ignored or blocked by most Western health authorities: evidence-based early and prophylactic treatment. It may have been just too cost-efficient.

SPR readers were among the first in the world to get the actual facts about the real covid mortality profile; the huge importance of nursing homes (still ignored by most IFR modelers); the ineffec­tive­ness of cloth masks, lockdowns and ‘contact tracing’; the remdesivir fraud; the anti-HCQ ploy; the reality of long covid; the ventilator disaster; the trouble with PCR tests; the Mojiang miners virus origin hypothesis; widespread media disinformation; and effective early treatment options.

Overall, the covid pandemic is closest to a medium influenza pandemic (like 1957 and 1968) hitting aged populations in industrialized countries with a high rate of cardiovascular disease. With the notable exceptions of children and Black Africa, covid is clearly worse than the ‘seasonal flu’, but clearly milder than the 1918 influenza and previous global pandemics.

north-dakota-south-dakota-mask-comparison

Vir: SPR

Dodatno branje:

6 responses

  1. Precej zalostno, da izkoriscate svojo platformo za sirjenje teorij zarote in reklamiranja propagandisticnega portala. Iz wikipedije:

    In 2017 a University of Zurich report on media in Switzerland analyzed “six of the most-discussed ‘alternative media'”, including SPR. Daniel Vogler concluded that SPR “resorts to conspiracy theories”, and its contents are mostly “pseudo-scientific”.[6]

    Andrea Haefely wrote a critique of the website in the magazine Beobachter in May 2020, noting: “The website Swiss Propaganda Research assumes that the Swiss media does what SPR itself does: feed the readers with questionable information.” She also suggested that the persistent use of the letter ß on the site suggests that the content creator is likely to be from outside Switzerland, as this particular letter form is not in common use within Switzerland.[5]

    Stephan Russ-Mohl, professor of journalism and media management at the Università della Svizzera italiana, considers the articles on the SPRS to themselves serve as propaganda, rather than being serious research on the subject. He has noted that the anonymity of the website creates doubts over the reliability and authenticity of its research, particularly in a country such as Switzerland, which has full freedom of its press.[4]

  2. Glede primerjave ND in SD bi priporocal kaksen bolj zanesljiv vir, recimo nytimes.com:

    Tako ND kot SD sta “businesses mostly open”, s tem, da ima ND celo odprte kinomatografe, SD pa ne, ostalo je enako (medtem ko SPR trdi: ND Business restrictions, SD no business restrictions). Do sredine novembra je ND bila brez kaksrnihkoli omejitev, vkljucno z maskami, od tedaj naprej ND ima obvezne maske (in je imela epizodo omejitve kapacitet barov in restavracij na 50%). To res ne more biti case study za primerjavo ustreznosti ukrepov…

  3. @jure

    In kateri so verodostojnejši mediji kot SPR? Vsaj jaz mislim, da so različna mnenja dobrodošla.

    Ti trije članki niso napačni

    https://swprs.org/covid-19-virus-origin-the-mojiang-miners/

    https://swprs.org/on-the-treatment-of-covid-19/

    https://swprs.org/covid-masks-review/ (potrjuje trditev iz katere se je naš PV norčeval, sedaj jo vsi ponavljajo, da je važno zračenje prostorov, ker se verjetno virus širi tudi tako kot cigaretni dim)

    Glede na moja opažanja našega boja z epidemijo, smo pogrnili na celi črti. Po dveh mesecih stihijskih (za to obstaja boljši izraz, in ne mislim medcinskega) zelo strogih ukrepov ni napredka, današnje številke že kažejo vpliv prejšnjega tedna. V zadnjem tednu ne vem niti, če pbstaja še strokovna skupina za epidemijo (šefica se je zadnji mesec tudi v javnih nastopih izgubila), niti mi ne vliva nekega zaupanja vrnitev državne sekretarke na ministrstvo – njeno zimsko spanje poleti se verjetno tudi odraža v številkah (samo da sedaj ne bomo dobili kakšnih mask ponovno).

    Lahko sicer nadaljujemo z ukrepi, ampak vedno več ljudi ne bo videlo smisla v njih. Trdorkec, ki je na oblasti, lahko tudi verjame, da bo kaznovanje pomagalo, ampak ne bo.

    Google doktor Milan predvideva, da bomo v krču do marca 2021, ko bo tudi vseeno če imamo cepljenje ali ne (dosegli bomo čredno imunost). Od takrat dalje se bo začel upad.

  4. Nova Zelandija? Avstralija? Tajvan? Vietnam? Singapur? Finska? Norveška? Če že ne verjamemo Kitajski…

  5. J. Koreja? Tajska? Ali pa navsezadnje Nemčija, ki dokazuje, da se tudi sredi Evrope in na demokratičen način da odreagirati relativno učinkovito.

%d bloggers like this: