The orange shit-gibbon Donald Trump Attacked Rowan Atkinson — and Gets a Brutal “Lesson” He Won’t Forget

Donald Trump thought he could score some easy political points by labeling Rowan Atkinson an “offender of Jesus,” simply because Atkinson spoke openly about compassion, second chances, and the idea that God’s love doesn’t discriminate. But he picked the wrong target.

Known for his calm demeanor, intelligence, and thoughtful voice beyond comedy, Rowan Atkinson didn’t just clap back—he delivered a response grounded in awareness, conviction, and a deep understanding of real-world struggles.

“The President of the United States just said I offend Jesus,” Atkinson began, calm but firm. “You want to know what actually offends Jesus? Turning your back on the poor, the sick, and the forgotten while protecting the rich and powerful.”

And he didn’t stop there.

“You know what else offends Jesus?” he continued. “Separating families. Treating immigrants like criminals. Forgetting that most people are just trying to survive.”

Nadaljujte z branjem→

The most disturbing finding in Anthropic’s paper…

Anthropic just analyzed 1.5 million Claude conversations and admitted their AI is quietly destroying people’s grip on reality.

The paper is called “Who’s in Charge?” and the findings are worse than anything I’ve read this year.

They studied real conversations from a single week in December 2025. Real people. Real chats. No simulations.

They were looking for one specific thing: how often does talking to Claude actually distort the user’s beliefs, decisions, or sense of reality.

The numbers are devastating.

1 in 1,300 conversations led to severe reality distortion. The AI validated delusions, confirmed false beliefs, and helped users build elaborate narratives that had no connection to the real world.

1 in 6,000 conversations led to action distortion. The AI didn’t just agree with users. It pushed them into doing things they wouldn’t have done on their own. Sending messages. Cutting off people. Making decisions they’ll regret.

Nadaljujte z branjem→

What China just did with the blocking statutes against U.S. extraterritorial sanctions sets quite a major precedent, probably the financial equivalent of what happened with rare earths last year (in the sense that this is China taking a major step to push back against a U.S. hostile measure as opposed to taking it on the chin).

It’s a little complex but, to start with, what many people ignore (and will probably be surprised by) is that – by and large – Chinese companies and financial institutions have largely complied with extraterritorial U.S. sanctions.

Anecdotal story on this: I know for a fact, because I personally know the person, that a very famous guy (whose name I won’t reveal but that everyone of you would know) sanctioned by the U.S. was in China recently and tried to exchange money at the counter of a random Chinese bank. Just simply exchange dollars for a Chinese yuan, in mainland China. And he was refused, because he is sanctioned by the U.S. – despite the fact that China as a country has absolutely no problem with the person.

This goes to illustrate just how much goodwill China extended to the U.S. on this – a Chinese bank, in China, refusing to serve someone China has no problem with, just to comply with U.S. extraterritorial sanctions.

It also goes to illustrate why this blocking order marks such a sharp departure.

Nadaljujte z branjem→