Glenn Diesen: Vladno financirane nevladne organizacije so skorumpirale civilno družbo

Tale članek spodaj od enega izmed vodilnih mlajših evropskih teoretikov mednarodnih odnosov, Glenna Diesna, je obvezno branje za droben uvid v to, kako vladno financirane “nevladne organizacije” pod krinko “civilne družbe” širijo vladno propagando in kako manjšina vladno financiranih osebkov v “nevladnih organizacijah” v javnosti preglasi veliko večino družbe. To vlogo so “nevladne organizacije” odigrale tudi glede vojne v Ukrajini – brezsramno so širile ameriško propagando.

“Nevladne organizacije” so oksimoron, ker so praktično vse financirane s strani vlade. Zaradi tega je masaker, ki ga Musk in Trump delata nad USAID in NED, glavnima financerjema nevladnih organizacij po svetu, dober, kajti razkril je hobotnico in mehanizem delovanja “nevladnih organizacij” in pripeljal do bankrota in in propada večine izmed njih, ker bodo izgubile vladno financiranje. Poglejte samo dretje v ukrajinskem medijskem kokošnjaku, ko je prejšnji teden usahnilo financiranje s strani USAID. Nenadoma je zmanjkalo denarja za razširjanje ameriške propagande.

_____________

Organisations operating under the banner of “human rights non-governmental organisations” (NGOs) have become key actors in disseminating war propaganda, intimidating academics, and corrupting civil society. These NGOs act as gatekeepers determining which voices should be elevated and which should be censored and cancelled.

Civil society is imperative to balance the power of the state, yet the state is increasingly seeking to hijack the representation of civil society through NGOs. NGOs can be problematic on their own as they can enable a loud minority to override a silent majority. Yet, the Reagan doctrine exacerbated the problem as these “human rights NGOs” were financed by the government and staffed by people with ties to intelligence agencies to ensure civil society does not deviate significantly from government policies.

The ability of academics to speak openly and honestly is restricted by these gatekeepers. Case in point, the NGOs limit dissent in academic debates about the great power rivalry in Ukraine. Well-documented and proven facts that are imperative to understanding the conflict are simply not reported in the media, and any efforts to address these facts are confronted with vague accusations of being “controversial” or “pro-Russian”, a transgression that must be punished with intimidation, censorship, and cancellation.

I will first outline my personal experiences with one of these NGOs, and second how the NGOs are hijacking civil society.

Nadaljujte z branjem