Kako je CIA iz nič sfabricirala kitajski genocid nad Ujgurji

How the US spent tens of millions of dollars to trick the world into believing that the Chinese had genocided an entire minority group.

But they couldn’t find a single victim. 

The story of the rise and fall of the Uyghur Genocide Hoax is a stunning example of the power of Langley and Washington DC in global brainwashing.

Full details in the video, but some key points are below.

1.) The idea of fighting Islamist terrorism by creating tough re-education camps to instill patriotism came from France, NOT from China.

China’s de-radicalization program was different, focused on vocational training, education in the arts, and language courses.

2.) The stunning plan from the CIA-adjacent group known as the NED was to rebrand China’s vocational program as a series of “mass killings” and “atrocities” amounting to “genocide”.

The plotters met at a June 2019 conference in Washington, where NED leader Carl Gershman said the goal was to leave China “on the ash heap of history”, adding: “I believe that will happen.”

3.) But the US call for the world to back their claim of genocide in China flopped badly. Most of the world’s 200 countries refused—only seven (UK, Canada, Netherlands, Lithuania, France, Belgium and Czech Republic) agreed to back Washington’s completely evidence-free allegation.

4.)  By the end of 2019, the press was printing a stream of “atrocity” reports from five different Uyghur “human rights” projects. But ALL FIVE were western organizations financed by the NED—a crucial detail that NO western mainstream media outlet chose to include.

5.) By 2020, social media was carrying a huge number of allegations saying the number of Chinese Uyghurs who had been killed had now risen above six million—all using identical words and phrasing. In reality, there was no evidence of any sort of mass killings, as the US State Department’s own lawyers warned in print.

The sole image that the western mainstream press repeatedly printed as proof of the existence of the 2019 “concentration camps” was really a 2017 photograph of addicts at a drug rehab center listening to talks by a Muslim speaker, a recovered addict, and his mother.

6.) One US ambassador, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, strongly argued that despite the total lack of evidence, the Chinese had definitely committed genocide.

7.) In 2021, the NED financed a one-sided tribunal. A judge asked about the actual number of the “two million or three million” in the “internment camps”. The NED-financed witness, clearly embarrassed, said it was 5,567. One NED-financed “database” was found to contain images of Hong Kong movie stars.

8.) The US changed strategy. Okay, so China was not actually killing its Uyghur minority. But the birth rate of Uyghurs had fallen—and this could be taken as a genocide in itself, Washington argued. Scholars of genocide disagreed.

9.) Sex scandals hit the most prominent leaders in the NED’s Uyghur exploitation operation in 2024. Western mainstream media chose not to report this to their readers—but quoted these “human rights” groups less.

10.) In 2024 and 2025, the entire world was horrified to see a real genocide underway in Gaza. Western mainstream journalists abruptly halted reports on the entirely imaginary genocide in China—where the number of Uyghur Chinese continued to grow higher than the number of Han Chinese, both proportionally and in real terms.

TWIST IN THE TALE

This year, one US ambassador repeatedly mortified humanity. She was happy to raise her hand, alone, at the United Nations. to veto the world’s attempts to stop the slaughter in Gaza.

It was Linda Thomas-Greenfield. She was the woman who had declared an imaginary genocide to be real, and was now declaring a real genocide to be fake.

Somewhere in space, the God of Irony had a heart attack and died.

En odgovor

  1. V resnici je Kitajska doživela pravi teroristični val s strani Uigurov. V zadnjih 2 desetletjih je Kitajska zabeležila več kot 2 tisoč terorističnih napadov. Uiguri so predstavljali velik del (približno 30 tisoč) tujih borcev islamske države v Siriji.

    Kdo je financiral, oskrboval, usposabljal, zdravil borce ISIS-a vemo?

    Velikih močnih držav, po možnosti jedrskih sil, ne moreš zrušiti z vojaško silo. Lahko jih zrušiš samo od znotraj.

    Kako je že rekel Putin, ob ruskih napadih na ISIS-ove borce iz Srednje Azije:

    “Bolje,, da jih pobijem tu (V Siriji), kot da soočam z njimi doma”

    V resnici je Uigurov premalo, da bi lahko zrušili Kitajsko. Jih je pa dovolj, da lahko s tem oblatiš ugled Kitajske v svetu.

    Zanimivo, da Organizacija islamskih držav ni imela pripomb glede kitajskega ravnanja z Uigursko manjšino. Pa skočijo v zrak vsakič, ko se kakšnemu muslimanu kje v svetu skrivi las.

    Všeč mi je