Pravkr sem prebral knjigo “House of Huawei” (napisala jo je novinarka Washington Posta), ki ob portretu ustanovitelja Huaweija, Rena Zhengfeija, in kako je zgradil razvejan korporativni imperij z največjim R&R oddelkom na svetu in prvaka z največ patenti na leto, katerega vzpon na vse kriplje poskušajo zaustaviti v zahodnih državah, vzporedno opisuje evolucijo kitajskega tehnološkega in gospodarskega vzpona po letu 1979. Knjiga sicer ni literarni presežek, je pa dobra v prikazu razlike med kitajskim in zahodnim poslovnim modelom, ki se kaže tudi v Huaweijevi prvi “delničarski pogodbi”. Zahodni poslovni model temelji na maksimi “vrednosti za delničarje” (kar vodi v aberacije glede napihovanja borznih cen, da bi menedžment obdržal službe in čim več zaslužil z opcijami). Kitajski poslovni model pa temelji na maksimi “vrednosti za deležnike”, ki pa so predvsem zaposleni in kar vodi predvsem v reinvesticije dobičkov v razvoj in v razdelitev med zaposlene (ki so v primeru Huaweija edini delničarji).
Kitajski model temelji na povečevanju blaginje ljudi, kar se med drugim kaže tudi v tem, da je Kitajski v 40 letih uspelo iz vasi izgraditi več kot 100 milijonskih mest (mesta z več kot 1 mio prebivalcev). Natančneje, uspelo ji je izgraditi stanovanja za prebivalce v teh sto novih milijonskih mestih, skupaj z moderno prometno in družbeno infrastrukturo (vrstci, šole, zdravstveni domovi, bolnišnice, upravne stavbe). Si predstavljate kakšen socialni transfer je to in kakšna je vrednost tega nepremičninskega portfelja, če bi ga ovrednotili po zahodnih cenah?
In kitajski poslovni model se kaže tudi v enormni gospodarski rasti – Kitajska danes ob 4.5 % rasti BDP uspe vsaka 4 leta povečati svoj BDP za eno Nemčijo. Si predstavljate – vsaka 4 leta gospodrasko zraste za eno Nemčijo!
No, ob tem pa zahodni mediji zadnjih 30 let neumorno vodijo propagandno kampanjo proti Kitajski v stilu, da bo zdaj zdaj kolapsirala (zadnjič sem objavil listo naslovov teh člankov). Kar se pa nikoli ne usresniči. In vsak kitajski dosežek, na kateremkoli področju, od izboljšanja blaginje do manjših izpustov CO2, opremijo s vprašanjem v naslovu članka: “ampak s kakšnimi stroški?” Tile članki sicer spominjajo na basen o lisici in kislem grozdju.
Spodaj je ena lista takšnih člankov.
________
- Global Markets – 1st quarter 2007 : China powers ahead – but at what cost?
– Fin Law, Feb 09, 2007 - China pumps up the Cambodian economy, but at what cost?
– Taipei Times Apr 07 2011 - Luxury Property in China: Boom, but at what cost?
– Spears, Oct 18 2011
- Tibet: Tourism Rises, But At What Cost?
– UNPO, Dec 28 2011 - China brings jobs to Ethiopia but at what cost?
– Horn Affairs, May 31 2012 - China: smartphone market domination…but at what cost?
– GFK, Feb 27 2014 - China wants the Gold but at what Cost? – Disturbing Road to Olympic Stardom
– Linkedin, Aug 14 2016 - Podcast: China Aims for Bluer Skies Ahead, But at What Cost to Commodity Demand?
– SPGlobal, 2017 - Peter Bart: Hollywood Has Appetite For China’s Big Bucks, But At What Cost?
– Deadline, Mar 2 2017 - China is driving a boom in Brazilian mining, but at what cost?
– China Dialogue, Jul 27 2017 - Chinese Tech Firms Are at the Cutting Edge of Artificial Intelligence — But at What Cost?
– Global Voices, 28 Aug 2017 - China Invests in Environment – but at What Cost?
– US News, Apr 20 2018 - China’s Belt and Road poised to transform the Earth, but at what cost?
– Mongabay, Apr 24 2018 - China’s Belt and Road poised to transform the Earth, but at what cost to the environment?
– Eco Business, Apr 25 2018 - China May Become the World’s Leader in AI. But at What Cost?
– China File, Jul 30 2018 - President Xi pledges $60 Billion to African Countries, but at what Cost?
– Medium, Sep 8 2018 - Vatican–China relations are warming up, but at what cost?
– East Asia Forum, 23 Oct 2018 - Gene-edited babies: China wants to be the world leader, but at what cost?
– The Conservation, Nov 26 2018 - China’s economy looks to be stabilising, but at what cost?
– France24, Apr 17 2019 - China’s Big Cities Get Cleaner Air, But at What Cost?
– Caixing, Oct 26 2019 - China’s Experimental Cure for Cancer
China’s curing cancer faster and cheaper than anywhere else. But some worry they may be going too fast.
– Bloomberg, Dec 12th 2019 - China is getting smarter – but at what cost?
– BBC, Dec 24 2019 - Hou Jianbin wants to educate China. But at what cost?
– Protocol - A better, stronger China after the epidemic? But at what cost?
– Think China, Feb 21 2020 - China May Forge Ahead of the Us in AI Chip Race, but at What Cost to Both?
– CIGI, Apr 9 2020 - China’s Three Gorges Dam may be safe for now, but at what cost?
– Dams, Rivers and People, 27 Jul 2020 - Serbia has rolled out the red carpet to China – but at what cost?
– Euronews, Oct 08 2020 - The BRI’s Footprint in the Lower Mekong Region Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam all need infrastructure—but at what cost?
– RosaLux, Dec 15 2020 - Chinese PD-1s secure broad reimbursement, but at what cost?
– Pharmaletter, Dec 28 2020 - Green Transition in China: At What Cost?
– Green Europe Journal, 16 Jan 2021 - Wuhan one year on: The city that appears safe from Covid – but at what cost?
– Telegraph, Jan 23 2021 - China’s economy grows, but at what cost? (vid)
– SCMP, Jan 27 2021 - China Is Imposing Strict Lockdowns To Contain New COVID Outbreaks. But There’s A Cost
– NPR, Sep 2 2021 - China keeps virus at bay but at what cost?
– Sioux City Journal, Sep 21 9 2021 - China keeps virus at bay at high cost ahead of Olympics
– ABC News, Sep 21 2021 - China celebrates Meng Wanzhou’s return as a victory — even at the cost of its global image ´
– CNN, Sep 28 2021 - Clean Air at What Cost? The Rise of Blunt Force Regulation
– US China Dialogue, Oct 21 2021 - China Rewriting Economic Narrative – But At What Cost?
– BMF, Oct 27 2021 - China’s ‘Zero Covid’ Efforts Come With a Cost
– New York Times, Nov 12 2021 - China is now controlling the weather. What’s the environmental cost?
– Euronews, Dec 9 2021 - Ultra-leftist voices are making themselves heard in China, but at what cost?
– SCMP, Dec 24 2021
Vir: Moon of Alabama
Hja, Huaweei. Spomnim se 90-tih, ko mi je znanec omenil neko kitajsko telekomunikacijsko podjetje, ki je menda že večje od ISKRA-e?!?!
Aprila lansko leto sem bil z državno delegacijo v največjem razvojnem centru Huawei-ja v Shenzhen-u kjer dela večina od več kot 100.000 razvojnikov. Od posameznega dela do drugega se voziš ž železnico. Campus je kopija evropskih univerz: Od Cambridg-a, Sorbonne-, Prage. Bolonje,…Gre za atribut evropskim centrom znanja, kjer se je dogajal razvoj znanstvene misli. Vodička nam je posebej omenila, da je Ren še posebaj spodbujal gradnjo kavarn po kompleksu, da bi spodbujal druženje kitajskih znanstvenikov in neformalno izmenjavo misli, ki se drugaće že zaradi kulturnega ozadja bolj držijo sami zase.
In pomislite. Gre za samoupravno podjetje. Kaj smo Jugoslovani, ki smo bili nekoč intenziven predmet študija Kitajske, naredili narobe?
Všeč mi jeLiked by 1 person