Kitajska diverzija na dolar: CIPS proti SWIFT – 7.2 sekundi proti 3-5 dni

The Final Showdown Between China and the U.S.: The Battlefield Shifts from Military Hegemony to Global Currency Warfare

As the clock struck 3 a.m. on Wall Street, Switzerland’s banking clearing system suddenly flashed a red alert—China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS 2.0), powered by the digital yuan, went live simultaneously across 16 ASEAN and Middle Eastern countries. The first transaction, a 120 million yuan ($16.5 million) payment for auto parts, cleared from Shenzhen to Kuala Lumpur in 7.2 seconds. This speed, faster than a blink, rendered SWIFT’s three-day processing cycle a relic of the “Stone Age.” The global financial world finally awoke: a bloodless currency war, armed with blockchain scalpels, had sliced open the veins of dollar hegemony. 

Behind the Blitzkrieg: What 7 Seconds Upended Beyond Speed 

The digital yuan’s “financial blitzkrieg” struck three fatal weaknesses of the dollar system: 

  1. Cost Annihilation: A cross-border e-commerce company’s ledger revealed that a $100,000 payment to a Thai supplier via SWIFT incurred $4,950 in fees (4.95%) and took 72 hours. Using CIPS 2.0, it cost $0.12 in network fees and settled instantly. This shift from “toll roads to data plans” slashed annual global trade settlement costs—worth $30 trillion—by over 90%.
  2. Technological Supremacy: In tests by Singapore’s DBS Bank, the digital yuan’s *dual offline payment* function completed transactions without internet, while SWIFT’s VISA/Mastercard systems collapsed. More revolutionary was *smart contract technology*: when Malaysian palm oil arrived at Tianjin Port, the system auto-released payment, eliminating document fraud plaguing traditional trade.
  3. Security Revolution: The UAE Central Bank showcased a money laundering case where the digital yuan’s blockchain ledger tracked every cent. A syndicate’s attempt to launder funds through 16 layered accounts was intercepted by AI risk controls in 0.3 seconds. In contrast, 85% of SWIFT’s cross-border money laundering cases require manual tracing, averaging 47 days.

De-Dollarization Tsunami: 16 Nations Pivot 

This financial infrastructure revolution is triggering a chain reaction: 

  • ASEAN announced that 90% of intraregional trade will settle in digital yuan by 2025, with Indonesia adding the yuan to its core forex reserves.
  • Saudi Aramco’s crude oil contract with Sinopec now prices 65% in digital yuan, cutting settlement from T+5 to T+0.
  • The City of London rushed to launch a “digital pound accelerator,” but Bank of England officials admitted: “We’re at least 2.3 years behind China.”
  • Twilight of Hegemony: SWIFT’s Last Stand

Facing this tech gap, the dollar system’s counterattacks falter. When the U.S. Treasury threatened sanctions, Malaysia’s central bank retorted: “We refuse to launder money for Afghan opium traffickers anymore.” SWIFT’s data shows 23% of suspicious transactions flow to “unknown” entities. Worse, China controls 78% of global rare earth refining and 85% of neodymium magnet production—critical for blockchain miners. This “resource-tech duopoly” fortifies the digital yuan’s defenses. 

Endgame: When Financial Infrastructure Becomes the New Nuke 

This revolution aims to democratize finance through technology. As cross-border payments shift from “exclusive couriers for elites” to “instant messaging for all,” the dollar’s “monopoly rent from settlement systems” will vanish. Nobel economist Stiglitz noted: “The digital yuan isn’t replacing the dollar—it’s redefining the dimensions of monetary civilization.” 

Final Thought: 

When 7-second settlements become routine, and blockchain ledgers replace bank credit, how will global currency dynamics mutate? Will this “financial blitzkrieg” accelerate a multipolar monetary system, or provoke a desperate counterstrike from traditional powers? Share your predictions in the comments. 

*Chen Chen’s Insight, Baidu Dynamics*

Vir: Eric Yeung

En odgovor

  1. (Zlasti) to, tule povedano, plus tehnološka presenečenja Kitajske npr. pri zmogljivih mikročipih, dobro razloži namere (nuje) Trumpa, da se čimprej izogne izgubi v ukrajinski vojni.

    Všeč mi je

  2. SWIFT nikoli ni imel samo bančne funkcije. Je orodje za kontrolo finančnih tokov. Ne vem, če še, ampak donedavnega je omrežje SWIFT-a upravljal IBM na zasebnem omrežju na katerm so tekli tudi radarski podatki civilnega letalskega omrežja.

    Pomenil je kontrolo nad čisto vsako bančno transakcijo; kdo , komu , koliko? (Zakaj mislite smo morali ukinitii nekdaj zelo uspešno SDK- Službo Družbenega Knjigovodstva? )

    Pred leti je EU poskušali omejiti sicer formalno evropski SWIFT, vendar brez uspeha. Iniciativa je potihoma zamrla. Je morala.

    S tem ko so američani SWIFT uporabili kot orožje pritiska, so so si sami skopali grob. Je pa to lep primer zahodne arogance in izgubljanja stika z realnostjo. In predvsem lastnega precenjevanja. Tehnološko SWIFT ni nič posebnega. Gre za zastarelo tehnologijo.

    Preostali dnevi SWIFT-a so šteti.

    Všeč mi je