Raj Chetty spreminja način, kako Harvard poučuje študente ekonomijo

Brez visoke abstrakcije s krivuljami ponudbe in povpraševanja in s konceptom potrošnikovega presežka in brez matematike, pač pa oborožen z ducatom najnovejših empiričnih raziskav, Raj Chetty na Harvardu spreminja način poučevanja ekonomije. Ne uči, kako naj bi se posamezniki v teoriji odzivali na spodbude, ampak kako se v praksi obnašajo.

Vsi mi bi morali biti bolj Chettyjevski. Se trudimo, vendar smo – preden pridemo do empirije – še vedno preveč vezani na “neo-…” teoretske koncepte.

Because Harvard has a tendency to set the pattern for other universities, Ec 10’s textbook is a massive best-seller, used at dozens of other schools, earning its author, professor Greg Mankiw, an estimated $42 million in royalties since it was first released in 1998. Mankiw’s introduction to economics has set the tone not just at Harvard but for how Econ 101 is taught across the country.

Mankiw’s textbook covers the abstract theory that underpins economics as it has been understood for decades. It is about supply and demand, about how prices can be used to match production of a good to its consumption, and about the power of markets as a tool for allocating scarce resources. Students in Ec 10 are asked to plot supply and demand curves, to solve simple word problems about what happens when the mayor of Smalltown, USA, imposes a tax on hotel rooms.

The idea is to impart a basic theory, to lay a foundation for understanding how society works. And that theory strongly implies that markets tend to work without much intervention, and that things like minimum wages might hurt more than help.

But another Harvard economist has a different idea of how to introduce students to economics.

Raj Chetty, a prominent faculty member whom Harvard recently poached back from Stanford, this spring unveiled “Economics 1152: Using Big Data to Solve Economic and Social Problems.” Taught with the help of lecturer Greg Bruich, the class garnered 375 students, including 363 undergrads, in its first term. That’s still behind the 461 in Ec 10 — but not by much.

The courses could hardly be more different. Chetty has made his name as an empirical economist, working with a small army of colleagues and research assistants to try to get real-world findings with relevance to major political questions. And he’s focused on the roots and consequences of economic and racial inequality. He used huge amounts of IRS tax data to map inequality of opportunity in the US down to the neighborhood, and to show that black boys in particular enjoy less upward mobility than white boys.

Ec 1152 is an introduction to that kind of economics. There’s little discussion of supply and demand curves, of producer or consumer surplus, or other elementary concepts introduced in classes like Ec 10. There is no textbook, only a set of empirical papers. The material is relatively cutting-edge. Of the 12 papers students are required to read, 11 were released in 2010 or after. Half of the assigned papers were released in 2017 or 2018. Chetty co-authored a third of them.

And while most economics courses at Harvard require Ec 10 as a prerequisite, Ec 1152 does not. Freshmen can take it as their first economics course.

“I felt increasingly what we’re doing in our offices and our research is just totally detached from what we’re teaching in the intro classes,” Chetty says. “I think for many students, it’s like, ‘Why do I want to learn about this? What’s the point?’”

“It’s very different from the sciences, where as a kid you have a sense, it may not be very precise, but that people try to cure cancer,” he continues. He wants to give students a sense of the kind of economics that cures: that cures inequality, that identifies and fixes bad schools.

If this were just a pedagogical shift at Harvard, that would be one thing. But Chetty is aiming to make the course a model for other schools. After the financial crisis, many economists have concluded that Econ 101 is broken across the university system and is not preparing students for a world where markets frequently fail. Chetty’s class offers a new way to teach an introductory course, yet at the same time is more closely aligned with what contemporary economic research looks like. The course’s lecture videos are already available online, for students at other institutions to use.

That shift could change economics itself, by attracting a new breed of students who are intrigued by the field’s new empiricism, not put off by its mathiness and high theory. It could make economics departments more diverse, and more open to new perspectives from women and students of color.

 Vir: Dylan Matthews, Vox

2 responses

  1. Torej mu je uspelo iz neke resne vede oz. znanosti (ali vsaj predmeta ki se je trudil bit znanstveni, vsi vemo, da ne vedno najbolj posrečeno) narediti poligon za politiko identitete in ideološki boj? Temu naj bi ploskali?

  2. O Marija! To, da si izmišljuješ, kako naj bi se ljudje (subjekti) obnašali in delaš čudne teoretske konstrukte brez empirične podlage v podatkih, naj bi bilo znanstveno, to, da z resnim empiričnim (ekonometričnim) pristopom analiziraš podatke in ugotavljaš, kako se ljudje (subjekti) dejansko obnašajo, pa da je neznanstveno?! WTF?!

%d bloggers like this: